Abstract
In Experiment 1, complete presentation of the study list produced better free recall learning than did the usual item-by-item (discrete) presentation. The difference was large and held for items occurring one, two, or three times within a list, whether items were spaced or massed, and for discrete presentation rates of 2, 4, and 6 sec/item. Experiment 2 replicated this superiority of complete over discrete presentation (equating total study time), and Experiment 3 extended the finding to paired associate learning. Experiments 2 and 3 indicated that multiple presentations of a list at fast rates were superior to a single presentation at a more standard rate and only slightly inferior to a single, complete presentation. Practical implications for instruction were pointed out, as were problems that certain of the results pose for theories that emphasize strategic (or at least extended) processing of items for encoding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Reder, L. M. An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Atkinson, R. C. Mnemotechnics in second-language learning.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 821–828.
Atkinson, R. C. &Raugh, M. R. An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,104, 126–133.
Brewer, C. L. Presentation time, trials to criterion, and total time in verbal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,73, 159–162.
Brown, S. C. &Brown, P. Comparison of successive and simultaneous methods of pair presentation in paired-association learning.Psychonomic Science, 1965,2, 309–310.
Brown, S. C. &Read, J. D. Effect of simultaneous list presentation on paired-associate learning.Psychological Reports, 1966,19, 787–790.
Bugelski, B. R. Presentation time, total time, and mediation in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 409–412.
Cooper, E. H., &Pantle, A. J. The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning.Psychological Bulletin, 1967,68, 221–234.
Foote, R. A., &Pollio, H. R. The role of associative organization in free recall under five different presentation conditions.Psychonomic Science, 1970,20, 205–207.
Hall, J. W., Grossman, L. R., &Elwood, K. D. Differences in encoding for free recall vs. recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 507–513.
Imhoff, D. L., Horton, D. L., Weldon, L. J., &Phillips, R. V. Rehearsal and processing capacity as factors in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 19773, 551–559.
Johnson, N. F. The functional relationship between amount learned and frequency vs. rate vs. total time of exposure of verbal materials.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 502–504.
Knox, W. J., &Wofe, I. S. Learning of meaningful and non-meaningful material by three methods of presentation.Psychological Record, 1965,15, 513–520.
Lauer, P. A., Streby, W. J., &Battig, W. F. The effects of alphabetic organization on the acquisition and delayed retention of semantically similar words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 182–189.
Light, L. L., &Schurr, S. C. Context effects in recognition memory: Item order and unitization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 135–140.
Melton, A. W. The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 596–606.
Moursund, J. P., &Chape, C. M. Comparison of three presentation methods in paired-associate learning.Psychonomic Science, 1966,6, 167–168.
Mueller, J. H., Rankin, J. L., &Carlomusto, M. Adult age differences in free recall as a function of basis of organization and method of presentation.Journal of Gerontology, 1979,34, 375–380.
Nodine, C. F. Stimulus durations and total learning time in paired-associates learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 534–536.
Raugh, M. R., &Atkinson, R. C. A mnemonic method for learning a second-language vocabulary.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 1–16.
Rohwer, W. D., Jr. Elaboration and learning in childhood and adolescence. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Stubin, E. J., Heimer, W. I., &Tatz, S. J. Total time and presentation time in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 308–310.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, J.W., Smith, T.A., Wegener, S.L. et al. Rate and frequency as determinants of learning with complete and discrete list presentation. Memory & Cognition 9, 360–367 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197560
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197560