Abstract
In the first experiment, the letters of words were overprinted; that is, successive letters were presented on the same location of the screen. Word identification was difficult unless the rate of presentation was slow, about 3 letters/sec. The second experiment showed that the low level of word identification did not reflect difficulty with basic letter identification. Instead, it reflected the rate at which short-term memory can accept separate items. While such results refute models of reading that stress a letter-by-letter integration, they do not test those that stress construction of higher order units. Instead, the task forces letter-byletter integration by removing spatial information, a dimension required for construction of higher order units. As a result, it does not permit integration of the correct units. The third experiment illustrated the construction and integration of supraletter units. Letter groups (either syllables or corresponding nonsyllable groups! were overprinted, a technique that introduces the spatial dimension. Word identification increased dramatically, and subjects were able to exploit the familiarity inherent in syllabic presentations. Thus, integration is much faster when more appropriate units can be used, and construction of the units depends on spatial information. The fourth experiment showed that the construction of supraletter units is achieved prior to short-term memory: Even though memory was able to group the material, the subjects could not use syllabic structure when syllables were isolated temporally but not spatially. The results were discussed in terms of a model describing the construction of higher order units.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference note
Mewhort, D. J. K., & Campbell, A. J.Parsing and the problem of “perceptual” units. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 1977.
References
Avis, W. (Ed.).Gage Canadian dictionary. Toronto: Gage, 1973.
Hansen, D., &Rogers, T. S. An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1968.
Hearty, P. J., &Mewhort, D. J. K. Spatial localization in sequential letter displays.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1975,29, 348–359.
Huey, E. B.The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T Press, 1968. (Originally published, 1908).
Kolers, P. A. Experiments in reading.Scientific American, 1972,227(1), 84–91.
Kolers, P. A., &Katzman, M. T. Naming sequentially presented letters and words.Language and Speech, 1966,9, 84–95.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Manelis, L., &Atkinson, R. C. Tachistoscopic recognition of syllabicated words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,26, 158–166.
Mewhort, D. J. K. Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic identification.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1974,28, 383–398.
Mewhort, D. J. K. DIS: An n-channel tachistoscope algorithm.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1978,10, 756–760.
Mewhort, D. J. K., &Beal, A. L. Mechanisms of word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 629–640.
Mewhort, D. J. K., &Campbell, A. J. Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 93–101.
Miller, G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 81–97.
Purcell, D. G., Stanovich, K. E., &Spector, A. Visual angle and the word superiority effect.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 3–8.
Smith, E. E., &Spoehr, K. T. The perception of printed English: A theoretical perspective. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs, 1960,11(Whole No. 498).
Taft, M. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbalBehavior, 1979,18, 21–39. (a)
Taft, M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency-effect.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 263–272. (b)
Travers, J. R. The effects of forced serial processing on identification of words and random letter strings.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 109–137.
Venezky, R. L.The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant APA-318 from the National Research Council of Canada to the first author. We thank Pat Crawford and M. J. Withey for assistance in conducting experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mewhort, D.J.K., Campbell, A.J. The rate of word integration and the overprinting paradigm. Memory & Cognition 8, 15–25 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197547
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197547