Abstract
Subjects were presented with concrete and abstract sentences equal in lexical complexity and comprehension rating and tested on their ability (1) to recognize the words used in the sentences when presented at a 3-sec rate and (2) to recreate the initial sentences when presented with a list of the words used. Only on this second task was there a significant concrete/abstract difference. In a second experiment, there was a significant concrete/abstract difference in word recognition when a 6-sec decoding rate was used. It was suggested that the best explanation of these results could be offered by a semantic analog model of language memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G.H.Human associative memory. Washington, D. C.: Winston & Sons, 1973.
Begg, I. Recall of meaningful phrases. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 431–439.
Begg, I. Imagery and integration in the recall of words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1973, 27, 159–167.
Begg, I., & Paivio, A. Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8,821–827.
Bower, G.H. Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 529–533.
Bransford, J. D. & Johnson. M. K. Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing, New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A citique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 335–359.
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 472–517.
Holyoak, K. J. The role of imagery in the evaluation of sentences: Imagery or semantic factors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 163–166.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., Nyberg, S. E., & Cleary, J. J. Comprehension factors in interpreting memory for abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11,451–454.
Mistler-Lachman, J. Levels of comprehension in processing of normal and ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 614–623.
Mistler-Lachman, J. L. Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 98–106.
Moeser, S. D. Memory for meaning and wording in concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 682–697.
Paivio, A. Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. Canadian Jovrnal of Psychology, 1966, 20, 378–387.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
Peterson, M. J., & Murray, A. The enhancement of items and associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 101, 82–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by National Research Council of Canada Grant A9638 to the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moeser, S.D. Memory for language organization in concrete and abstract sentences. Memory & Cognition 3, 560–568 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197531
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197531