Abstract
The auditory suffix effect (SE), in which recall of the terminal items of a sequence is impaired by presenting a redundant item at the end of the sequence, has been attributed to the displacement of information from auditory sensory storage. However, the SE may result entirely from unnecessary processing of the redundant item due to a failure of attentional control. Two studies examined this possibility using visual presentation to minimize the importance of sensory storage as a source of information. Experiment I first demonstrated a visual SE and showed that its magnitude did not vary when background illumination was altered, a factor which affects the duration of sensory storage. Experiment II used auditory as well as visual presentation and tested the hypothesis that training subjects to ignore the suffix would reduce the SE. Training was achieved by interpolating redundant items identical to the suffix within sequences. It abolished the visual SE but left the auditory SE unaffected. The visual SE, therefore, is not solely determined by the physical characteristics of the suffix, and cannot be based on erasure in sensory storage. The auditory data, on the other hand, were consistent with the erasure hypothesis. It was concluded that an SE does not of itself demonstrate the involvement of sensory storage, and, in particular, the visual SE appears to reflect the degree to which the redundant item can be excluded from focal attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averbach, E., & Sperling, G. Short-term storage of information in vision. In C. Cherry (Ed.),Information theory: Proceedings of the fourth London symposium. London: Butterworth, 1961.
Broadbent, D. E.Decision and stress. London: Academic Press, 1971.
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. Input modality and the serial position curve in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science, 1966,10, 135–136.
Corballis, M. C. Rehearsal and decay in immediate recall of visually and aurally presented items. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1966,20, 43–51.
Crowder, R. G. Improved recall for digits with delayed recall cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 258–262
Crowder, R. G. Waiting for the stimulus suffix: Decay, delay, rhythm and readout in immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,23, 324–340.
Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 365–373.
Hamilton, P., & Hockey, R. Active selection of items to be remembered: The role of timing. Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 61–83.
Kahneman, D.Attention and effori. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Morton, J. A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Morton, J., Crowder, R. G., & Prussin, H. A. Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 169–190.
Routh, D. A. Independence of the modality effect and amount of silent rehearsal in immediate serial recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 213–218.
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74, No. 11.
Sperling, G. A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 1963,5, 19–31.
Watkins, M. J., & Watkins, O. C. A tactile suffix effect. Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 176–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the British Medical Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hitch, G.J. The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects. Memory & Cognition 3, 501–505 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197521
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197521