Abstract
The present paper compared the processing of complex embedded sentences in Chinese, Norwegian, and English to determine if the underlying mental operations are similar in these diverse languages. The task involved reading a sentence likeIt’s true that the dots aren’t red and deciding whether it was true or false according to an accompanying picture. The verification latencies were analyzed in terms of a model based on one central mental operation. The results for all three languages conformed to the predictions of the model and showed similar processing rates. Moreover, the Norwegian study expanded the analysis to include quantification in sentences likeIt’s true that many of the dots aren’t red. These studies suggest that certain fundamental operations may be universally implicated in language processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Young, R., & Chase, W. G. Additive stages in the coparison of sentences and pictures. Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association meetings, April 1971.
References
Asch, S. E. The metaphor: A psychological inquiry. In M. Henle (Ed.),Documents of gestalt psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961.
Berlin, B., & Kay, P.Basic color terms. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
Bierwisch, M. Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. Foundations of Language, 1967, 3, 1–36.
Brown, R., Black, A. H., & Horowitz, A. E. Phonetic symbolism in natural language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 50, 388–393.
Carpenter, P. A. Extracting information from counterfactual clauses. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 512–521.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A, Semantic control of eye movements during picture scanning in a sentence-picture verification task. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 12, 61–64,
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 45–73.
Clark, H. H., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. On the meeting of semantics and perception. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Greenberg, J. H.Language universals. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.
Jackendoff, R. S. An interpretive theory of negation. Foundations of Language, 1969, 5, 218–241.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 244–253.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. The semantics of locative information in pictures and mental images. British Journal of Psychology, 1975, in press.
Klima, E. S. Negation in English. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.),The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
Lenneberg, E. H.Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.
Osgood, C. E. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist, 1964, 66, 171–200.
Slobin, D. I. Universals of grammatical development in children. In G. B. Flores d’Axcals & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.),Advances in psycholinguistics, London: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1970.
Slobin, D. I. Developmental psycholinguistics. In W. O. Dingwall (Ed.),A survey of linguistic science. Maryland: University of Maryland Press, 1971.
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 1969, 57, 421–457.
Trabasso, T. Mental operations in language comprehension. In J. B. Carroll & R. O. Freedle (Eds.),Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, D. C.: V. H. Winston & Sons, 1972.
Wason, P. C. Response to affirmative and negative binary statements. British Journal of Psychology, 1961, 52, 133–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Experiment II was run while the authors were visiting scholars at the University of Oslo.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A. Comparative studies of comprehension: An investigation of Chinese, Norwegian, and English. Memory & Cognition 3, 465–473 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197516
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197516