Abstract
The relative lengths of two rows of objects systematically affected the time to make judgments of the relative number of objects. The time to decide which row contained more objects generally increased with the amount of incongruity between length and number (e.g., reaction time was long when the numerically larger row was the shorter of the two). In addition, the time to decide that the rows contained an equal number of objects increased with the disparity in length between the rows. These results suggest that length information was used in the numerical comparison process. A model that uses an internal transformation of row length is proposed to account for the results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
1. Hinrichs, J. V.Physical and numerical size in number comparisons. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1976.
References
Banks, W. P., Clark, H. H., &Lucy, P. The locus of the semantic congruity effect in comparative judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,104, 35–47.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1131–1136.
Bundesen, C., &Larsen, A. Visual transformations of size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 214–220.
Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. Position, direction, and their perceptual integrality.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 328–334.
Dixon, P., &Just, M. A. Normalization of irrelevant dimensions in stimulus comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 36–46.
Gelman, R. Conservation acquisition: A problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1969,7, 167–187.
Gelman, R. The nature and development of early number concepts. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Keele, S. W. Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 245–248.
Krueger, L. E. Effects of irrelevant surrounding material on speed ofsame-different judgment of two adjacent letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 252–259.
Paivio, A. Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 635–647.
Piaget, J.The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952.
Pufall, P. B., &Shaw, R. E. Precocious thought on number: The long and short of it.Developmental Psychology, 1972,7, 62–69.
Shepard, R. N., Kilpatric, D. W., &Cunningham, J. P. The internal representation of numbers.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 82–138.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science, 1971,171, 701–703.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH-29617.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon, P. Numerical comparison processes. Memory & Cognition 6, 454–461 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197479
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197479