Abstract
Four experiments are reported that examine the effects of homophony (e.g., SAIL/SALE) on response latency in a lexical decision task. The results indicated that an effect of homophony was evident only if the nonword distractors consisted of legal, pronounceable strings (e.g., SLINT), but that this effect disappeared if the nonwords sounded like English words (e.g., BRANE). An optional encoding strategy is proposed to account for this differential effect. It is suggested that while both graphemic and phonemic encoding occurred simultaneously, naive subjects tended to rely on the outcome of the phonological route. However, when such reliance produced a high error rate (i.e., when the nonwords sounded like English words),. these subjects were able to abandon a phonological strategy and rely on the graphemic encoding procedure instead. Two further aspects of the results are of interest. First, the less frequent member of a homophone pair was slower when compared with a control item if the nonword distractors were of the SLINT type, but not different if they were of the BRANE type. The high-frequency members did not differ from their controls in either nonword environment. Second, in a homophone “repetition” experiment, the frequency order of presentation within pairs of homophones (i.e., the high-frequency member followed by the low-frequency member, or vice versa) had a substantial effect. A spelling recheck procedure and a response-inhibitory mechanism are postulated to incorporate these effects into a dual-encoding direct-access model of word recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Scarborough, D. L., & Springer, L.Noun-verb differences in word recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1973.
Becket, C. A., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Gomez, L. M.Semantic, graphemic, and phonetic factors in word recognition. Paper presented at the 14th meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1973.
Coltheart, M., Jonasson, J., Davelaar, E., & Besner, D.Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. In preparation.
Meyer, D. E., & Ruddy, M. G.Lexical memory retrieval based on graphemic and phonemic representations of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1973.
Meyer, D. E., & Gutschera, K. D.Orthographic vs. phonemic processing of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver, Colorado, November 1975.
Lowe, D. Personal communication, 1975.
References
Baron, J. Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 241–246.
Bloomfield, L. Linguistics and reading.Elementary English, 1942,19, 125–130.
Bower, T. G. R. Reading by eye. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Cohen, G., & Freeman, R. Individual differences in reading strategies in relation to handedness and cerebral asymmetry. In J Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., &Besner, D. Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
Forster, K. J., &Chambers, S. M. Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12. 627–035.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2. 361–379.
Gough, P. B. One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & J. G Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1972.
Green.D. W., &Shallice, T. Direct visual access in reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 753–758.
Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., &Peterson, L. Flexible coding in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 380–385.
James, C. T. The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 130–136.
Kolers, P. A. Three stages in reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies in reading. New York. Basic Books, 1970.
Marcel, A. J., & Patterson, K. Word recognition and production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321. (a)
Meyer D. E., Schvanevfldt, R W., &Ruddy, M. G. Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1974. (b)
Morton, J. Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 165–178.
Neill.W. T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 444–450.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 645–657.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 1977, 3, 1–17.
Warren, R. E., &Warren, N. T. Dual semantic encoding of homographs and homophones embedded in context.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 586–592.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D. et al. Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition 6, 391–402 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197471
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197471