Abstract
Two experiments were carried out in order to try to resolve the controversy about whether the semantic processing of a word necessarily involves all the elements of its meaning. In the first experiment, subjects categorized a list of auditorially presented words according to whether or not they were natural consumable solids (e.g., “apple“). They were then given an unexpected test of their ability to recall the whole list, which contained equal numbers of words with none, one, two, or all three of the target components. The results confirmed the prediction that the greater the number of components a word has in common with a target category, the better it will be recalled. The second experiment used a visual presentation of a list of words, which subjects scanned for members of a particular target category. There were four different target categories assigned to independent groups of subjects. The results again confirmed the prediction. On the assumption that memorability in such tasks is determined by amount of processing, we conclude that some elements of the meaning of a word can be processed without having to process all of them.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. L. How to make a language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.
Fodor, J. D., Fodor, J. A., &Garrett, M. F. The psychological unreality of semantic representations.Linguistic Inquiry, 1975,4, 515–531.
Frase, L. T., &Kammann, R. Effects of search criterion upon unanticipated free recall of categorically related words.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 181–184.
Gibson, E. J. Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 351–368.
Hodgkin, D.An experimental study of sentence comprehension and semantic memory. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London, 1977.
Hyde, T. S. Differential effects of effort and type of orienting task on recall and organization of highly associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 111–113.
Hyde, T. S., &Jenkins, J. J. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization and recall of a list of highly associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 472–481.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. Meaning and the mental lexicon. In A. Kennedy & A. Wilkes (Eds.),Studies in long term memory. London: Wiley, 1975.
Klein, K., &Saltz, E. Specifying the mechanisms in a levds-of-processing approach to memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 671–679.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1967.
Mandler, G. Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Miller, G. A., &Johnson-Laird, P. N.Language and perception. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Nelson, T. O. Repetition and depth of processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 151–171.
Ornstein, P., Trabasso, T., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. The effects of instructions to organize and to recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,16, 1014–1018.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., &Smith, E. E. Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 1–20.
Schank, R. C. Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 552–631.
Schulman, A. I. Memory for words recently classified.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 47–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Gibbs, G. & de Mowbray, J. Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words. Memory & Cognition 6, 372–375 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197468
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197468