Abstract
A semantic network model is structured so that usually there is only one node in the network to represent each individual. A series of experiments were performed to determine under what circumstances subjects would show unitary memory for individuals. The experiments were principally concerned with the speed with which subjects could retrieve the facts and make inferences from them. Subjects learned facts about individuals which could be referred to by two labels. The semantic network model predicted that subjects would integrate facts learned to one label with facts learned to the other. Evidence for such integration was found, but only when considerable effort was taken to encourage the subjects to develop a unitary impression of the individual. The situation was also investigated in which the subjects did not learn of the identity between the two labels until after the facts were learned to each label individually. There was evidence that subjects set up two nodes to represent the. individual, one for each label. There was also evidence that, upon learning of the identity, subjects chose to abandon one of the two nodes and to start a process of copying information from the to-be-abandoned node to the preserved node.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 149–162.
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: V. H. Winston, 1973.
Anderson, J. R., &Hastie, R. Individuation and reference in memory: Proper names and definite descriptions.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 495–514.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect-fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Collins, A. M., Loftus, E. F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 407–428.
Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. How to make a language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization and memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Frege, G. Über sinn und bedetung.Zietschrift für Philosophie and philosophische Kritik, 1892, 100 (all). (Translation available in P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.),Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960. Pp. 56-78.)
Keenan, J. M.The role of episodic information in the assessment of semantic memory representations for sentences. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Colorado, 1975.
Kintsch, W.The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Loux, M. J. The problem of universals. In M. J. Loux (Ed.),Universals and particulars. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
Mendelson, E.Introduction to mathematical logic. New York: Van Nostrand. 1964.
Norman, D. A., Rumelhart, D. E., &The LNR Research Group.Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.
Ramsey, F. P.Universals: The foundations of mathematics. New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1931.
Russell, B.On the relations of universals and particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotilian Society, 1911-12,12, 1–24.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimentel design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants GB 40298 and BMS76-00959 from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, J.R. Memory for information about individuals. Memory & Cognition 5, 430–442 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197382
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197382