Abstract
Two differential eyelid conditioning studies employed grammatically correct and incorrect adjective-noun phrases as conditioned stimuli. For different groups of subjects, the nouns were either high or low in imagery. The hypothesis that congruency between grammatical correctness and reinforcement consequences (i.e., the aversive stimulus contingent upon presence of incorrect rather than correct grammar) would facilitate conditioned discrimination was not supported, but the hypothesis that high noun imagery would facilitate differential response to syntax received strong support. Cognitive awareness of the syntactic discriminandum was also related to effective differential responding, as well as being implicated as a mediating mechanism in the imagery effects. Finally, performance was also significantly related to conditioned-response topography, with better conditioned discrimination by voluntary-form (V) than by conditioned-form (C) responders, and also evidence of more effective utilization of contingency awareness by Vs than by Cs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Perry, L. C., & Perry, D. G.Semantic differential and word association responses as a function of correctness of adjective-noun phrase grammaticality and arithmetic problem solutions. Unpublished manuscript, 1976.
Reference
Cerekwicki, L. E., Grant, D. A., &Porter, E. C. The effect of number and relatedness of verbal discriminanda upon differential eyelid conditioning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 847–853.
Dawson, M. E. Can classical conditioning occur without contingency learning? A review and evaluation of the evidence.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 82–86.
Fleming, R. A., Cerekwicki, L. E., &Grant, D. A. “Appropriateness” of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of “right” and “wrong”.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 295–300.
Fleming, R. A., Grant, D. A., North, J. A., &Levy, C. M. Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 286–294.
Grant, D. A. A preliminary model for processing information conveyed by verbal conditioned stimuli in classical differential conditioning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning H: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Grant, D. A. Cognitive factors in eyelid conditioning.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 75–81.
Grings, W. W. Cognitive factors in electrodermal conditioning.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,79, 200–210.
Hartman, T. F., &Ross, L. E. An alternative criterion for the elimination of “voluntary” responses in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,61, 334–338.
Lockhart, R. A. Cognitive processes and the multiple response phenomenon.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 112–118.
Nelson, M. N., &Ross, L. E. Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: A distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1–9.
Palvio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart.& Winston, 1971.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968,76(1, Part 2).
Perry, L. C., Ornstein, P. A., Watters, W. C., &Grant, D. A. Effects of number and type of verbal conditioned stimuli upon differential eyelid conditioning.Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 459–469.
Watters, W. C.Transfer of the eyelid response differentially conditioned to sets of conceptually related verbal stimuli. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1970.
Yarmey, A. D. Word abstractness, awareness, and type of design in verbal mediation.Psychology, 1967,4, 24–32.
Zajano, M. J., Grant, D. A., &Schwartz, M. Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning: Effects of semantic and formal features of verbal stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1147–1152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This project was supported in part by Research Grant MH06972 to David A. Grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, L.C., Grant, D.A. & Schwartz, M. Effects of noun imagery and awareness of the discriminative cue upon differential eyelid conditioning to grammatical and ungrammatical phrases. Memory & Cognition 5, 423–429 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197381
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197381