Abstract
The proposal that identification of inverted objects is accomplished by either a relatively slow rotation in the picture plane or a faster rotation in the depth plane about the horizontal axis was tested. In Experiment 1, subjects decided whether objects at 0° or 180° corresponded to previously learned normal views of the upright objects, or were mirror images. Instructions to mentally flip an inverted object in the depth plane to the upright produced faster decision times than did instructions to mentally spin the object in the picture plane. In Experiment 2, the effects of orientation were compared across an object-naming task and a normal-mirror task for six orientations from 0° to 300°. In the normal-mirror task, objects at 180° were cued for rotation in the picture plane or in the depth plane in equal numbers. The naming function for one group of subjects did not differ from the normalmirror function where inverted objects had been mentally rotated to the upright. For both functions, response time (RT) increased linearly from 0° to 180° and the slopes did not differ. The naming function for a second group of subjects did not differ from the normal-mirror function where inverted objects had been mentally flipped to the upright. For both functions, RT increased linearly at a similar rate from 0° to 120°, but decreased from 120° to 180°. The results are discussed in terms of theories of orientation-specific identification.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bressan, P., &Vicario, G. B. (1984). On misoriented letters.Perception,13, 687–694.
Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects.Memory & Cognition,13, 289–303.
Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 461–478.
Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dualsystems theory.Mind & Language,5, 387–410.
Jolicoeur, P., &Milliken, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 200–210.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial abilities.Psychological Review,92, 137–172.
Koriat, A., Norman, J., &Kimchi, R. (1991). Recognition of rotated letters: Extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 444–457.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Maki, R. H. (1986). Naming and location of tops of rotated pictures.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 368–387.
Metzler, J., &Shepard, R. N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of 3-dimensional objects. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories of cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 147–201). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Murray, J. E. (1995a). Imagining and naming rotated natural objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 239–243.
Murray, J. E. (1995b). The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects.Memory & Cognition,23, 49–58.
Murray, J. E., Jolicoeur, P., McMullen, P. A., &Ingleton, M. (1993). Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects.Memory & Cognition,21, 604–610.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Visual discrimination of abstract mirrorreflected 3-dimensional objects at many orientations.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 49–59.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Shepard, R. N. (1975). Form, formation and transformation of internal representations. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 87–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of 3-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Tarr, M. J., &Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientationdependence in shape recognition.Cognitive Psychology,32, 193–254.
Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition.Cognition,32, 193–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada, and the University of Otago Research Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, J.E. Flipping and spinning: Spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition 25, 96–105 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197287
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197287