Abstract
The locus of category effects in picture recognition and naming was examined in two experiments with normal subjects. Subjects carried out object decision (deciding whether the stimulus is a “real” object or not) and naming tasks with pictures of clothing, furniture, fruit, and vegetables. These categories are distinguished by containing either relatively many exemplars with similar perceptual structures (fruit and vegetables;structurally similar categories), or relatively few exemplars with similar perceptual structures (clothing and furniture;structurally dissimilar categories). In Experiment 1, responses to the stimuli from the structurally similar categories were slower than responses to stimuli from the structurally dissimilar categories, and this effect was larger in the naming than in the object decision task. Further, prior object decisions to stimuli from structurally similar categories facilitated their subsequent naming. In Experiment 2, we orthogonally manipulated object decision and naming as prime and target tasks, again with stimuli from the four categories. Category effects, with responses slower to objects from structurally similar categories, were again larger in naming than in object decision, and these category effects in naming were reduced by priming with both naming and object decision. We interpret the data to indicate that category effects in object naming can reflect visually based competition which is reduced by the preactivation of stored structural knowledge for objects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chertkow, H., Bub, D., &Caplan, D. (1992). Constraining theories of semantic memory processing: Evidence from dementia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,9, 327–365.
Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., &Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 43–57.
Dell, G. S., &O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991).Psychological Review,98, 604–614.
Ellis, A., &Young, A. W. (1988).Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Erlbaum.
Farah, M. J., &McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 339–357.
Farah, M. J., McMullen, P. A., &Meyer, M. M. (1991). Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired?Neuropsychologia,29, 185–193.
Farah, M. J., &Wallace, M. A. (1992). Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming.Neuropsychologia,30, 609–621.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B., &Schreuder, R. (1987). Semantic activation during object naming.Psychological Research,49, 153–159.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Computational analyses of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Funnell, E. (1987). Object concepts and object names: Some deductions from acquired disorders of word processing. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.),Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 233–260). Hove: Erlbaum.
Funnell, E., &Sheridan, J. (1992). Categories of knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things.Cognitive Neuropsychology,9, 135–153.
Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming.Cognition,42, 61–105.
Hart, J., Bernt, R. S., &Caramazza, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction.Nature,316, 439–440.
Hillis, A. E., &Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation.Brain,114, 2081–2094.
Humphreys, G. W., Lamote, C., &Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1995). An in teractive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology.Memory,3, 535–586.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 67–103.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Job, R., Rumiati, R., &Lotto, L. (1992). The picture superiority effect in categorization: Visual or semantic?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1019–1028.
Kroll, J. F. (1990). Recognizing words and pictures in sentence contexts: A test of lexical modularity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 747–759.
Kroll, J. F., &Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object and reality decisions.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 39–66.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., &Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming.Psychological Review,98, 122–142.
Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1992). Category differences in object processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996).Categorizing pears and naming chairs: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Lupker, S. J. (1985). Relatedness effects in word and picture naming: Parallels, differences, and structural implications. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 109–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lupker, S. J. (1988). Picture naming: An investigation of the nature of categorical priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 444–455.
Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 147–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 273–281.
Price, C. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 797–828.
Riddoch, M. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987a). Picture naming. In G.W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.),Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 107–143). Hove: Erlbaum.
Riddoch, M. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987b). Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,4, 131–185.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 192–233.
Sacchett, C., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts.Cognitive Neuropsychology,9, 73–96.
Sartori, G., &Job, R. (1988). The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study of the interaction of visual and semantic information.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 105–132.
Sartori, G., Job, R., &Coltheart, M. (1993). The neuropsychology of visual semantics. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990a). Implicit memory for visual objects and the structural description system.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 367–372.
Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990b). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology; General,119, 5–24.
Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., &Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 3–19.
Schaeffer, B., &Wallace, R. (1969). Semantic similarity and the comparison of word meanings.Journal of Experimental Psychology,82, 343–346.
Seymour, P. H. K. (1979).Human visual cognition. London: Collier MacMillan.
Sheridan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1993). A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 143–184.
Shoben, E. J. (1976). The verification of semantic relations in a samedifferent paradigm: An asymmetry in semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 365–379.
Silveri, M. C., &Gainotti, G. (1988). Interaction between vision and language in a category-specific semantic impairment.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 677–709.
Snodgrass, J. G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 3–22.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). Standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms of name agreement, usage agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Stewart, F., Parkin, A. J., &Hunkin, N. M. (1992). Naming impairments following recovery from herpes simplex encephalitis: Category-specific?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 261–284.
Vitkovitch, M., Humphreys, G. W., &Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe a zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 243–259.
Warren, C. E. J., &Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming on picture naming.British Journal of Psychology,73, 117–130.
Warrington, E. K., &McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia.Brain,106, 859–878.
Warrington, E. K., &McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionation and an attempted integration.Brain,110, 1273–1296.
Warrington, E. K., &Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments.Brain,107, 829–853.
Wheeldon, L. R., &Monsell, S. (1992). The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 723–761.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant R-000-23-2412 from the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lloyd-Jones, T.J., Humphreys, G.W. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition 25, 18–35 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197282
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197282