Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 41–59 | Cite as

Is reading ability related to activation dumping speed? Evidence from immediate repetition priming

  • Nachshon MeiranEmail author
Article

Abstract

In parallel processing models, residual activity constitutes noise that must be dumped, and fast dumping is associated with efficient processing. Subjects performed a continuous lexical decision task with repetitions (Experiments 1 and 2). Efficient readers (who had high comprehension and vocabulary scores) showed smaller repetition priming than did inefficient readers, but mostly at Lag 0 (equivalent to 3-sec stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA]). Experiment 3 manipulated the empty interrepetition interval. It was found that reading ability was negatively related to repetition priming mostly when the SOA was 3 sec, but less so when it was 2 or 4 sec. Experiment 4 failed to find similar reading ability differences when the task was continuous recognition. The findings are interpreted as showing that efficient readers managed to dump residual activity related to subsemantic information in less than 3 sec, whereas inefficient readers required 3–4 sec.

Keywords

Lexical Decision Journal ofExperimental Psychology Verbal Ability Semantic Priming Repetition Priming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, M. H. (1976). Priming and property dominance in semantic memory.Memory & Cognition,4, 490–500.Google Scholar
  3. Balgur, R. (1968).Reshimat milot yesod lebeit hasefer [A list of elementary words for schools]. Ramat Gan, Israel: Otsar Hamore.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, J., &Treiman, R. (1980). Some problems in the study of differences in cognitive processes.Memory & Cognition,8, 313–321.Google Scholar
  5. Bentin, S. (1989). Orthography and phonology in lexical decision: Evidence from repetition effects at different lags.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentin, S., &McCarthy, G. (1994). The effects of immediate stimulus repetition on reaction time and event related potentials in tasks of different complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentin, S., &Moscovitch, M. (1988). The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briggs, P., Austin, S., &Underwood, G. (1984). The effects of sentence context in good and poor readers: A test of Stanovich’s interactive-compensatory model.Reading Research Quarterly,20, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1988).The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dannebring, G. L., &Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 435–444.Google Scholar
  15. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review,93, 283–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Den-Heyer, K., Goering, A., &Dannebring, G. L. (1985). Semantic priming and word repetition: The two effects are additive.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durgunoĝlu, A. Y. (1988). Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: Implications for the interactive—compensatory reading model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,4, 590–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farah, M. J., &McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in early phases of visual word recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 119–122.Google Scholar
  20. Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., &Salsoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischman, E. (1982).AKA: Ivkhun ksharim intellectualim [IDAT: Intellectual differential aptitude test battery]. Holon, Israel: Hamerkaz Le’Khinukh Technologi.Google Scholar
  22. Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fredriksen, J. R. (1982). A componential theory of reading skills and their interactions. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 125–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Friedrich, F. J., Henik, A., &Tzelgov, J. (1991). Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 792–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 217–263). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gernsbacher, M. A., &Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., &Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grossberg, S., &Stone, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Priming, learning, and resonance.Psychological Review,93, 46–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., &Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bauma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 211–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Hinton, G. E., &Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.Psychological Review,98, 74–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hockley, W. E. (1982). Retrieval processes in continuous recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt, E. (1978). Mechanics of verbal ability.Psychological Review,85, 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., &Lewis, A. J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal?Cognitive Psychology,7, 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackson, M. D. (1980). Further evidence for a relationship between memory access and reading ability.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, M. D., &McClelland, J. L. (1975). Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson, M. D., &McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction—integration model.Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirsner, K., &Smith, M. C. (1974). Modality effects in word identification.Memory & Cognition,2, 637–640.Google Scholar
  41. Kirsner, K., Smith, M. C., Lockhart, R. S., King, M. L., &Jain, M. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control in thought and action.Acta Psychologica,60, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mason, M. (1975). Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single letter positional frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClelland, J. L. (1986). A programmable blackboard model of reading. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 122–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  45. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1988).Exploration in parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E., &The PDP Research Group. (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  48. Meiran, N. (1989).IDAT: Retest reliabilities (Tech. rep.). Holon, Israel: Hamerkaz Le’khinukh Technologi.Google Scholar
  49. Meiran, N. (1990).Age-based norms for IDAT (Tech. rep.) Holon, Israel: Hamerkaz Le’khinukh Technologi.Google Scholar
  50. Merrill, E. C., Sperber, R. D., &McCauley, C. (1981). Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading comprehension skill.Memory & Cognition,9, 618–624.Google Scholar
  51. Milman, O., Tramer, S., Tzelgov, J., &Henik, A. (1987).Priming norms for Hebrew words. Beer Sheva, Israel: Ben Gurion University.Google Scholar
  52. Monsell, S. (1984). Components of working memory underlying verbal skills: A “distributed capacities” view. In H. Bauma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 327–350). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Navon, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information processing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., &Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context.Memory & Cognition,7, 273–282.Google Scholar
  58. Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Ratcliff, R., Hockley, W., &McKoon, G. (1985). Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenthal, R. (1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Rueckl, J. G. (1990). Similarity effects in word and pseudoword repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., &The PDP Research Group. (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  66. Salsoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M., &Feustel, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 50–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.Google Scholar
  70. Schneider, W., &Detwiler, M. (1987). A connectionist control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 53–120). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Schneider, W., &Detwiler, M. (1988). The role of practice in dual task performance: Toward workload modelling in connectionist/control architecture.Human Factors,30, 539–566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Ackerman, B. P., &Semlear, T. (1977). The effects of semantic context on children’s word recognition.Child Development,48, 612–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwantes, F. M., Boesi, S. L., &Ritz, E. G. (1980). Children’s use of context in word recognition: A psycholinguistic guessing game.Child Development,51, 730–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Shiffrin, R. (1976). Capacity limitations in information processing, attention, and memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 4, pp. 177–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  77. Shiffrin, R., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew.Psychological Bulletin,114, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simpson, G. B., Lorsbach, T. C., &Whitehouse, D. (1983). Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 161–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, M. C., Besner, D., &Miyoshi, H. (1994). New limits to automaticity: Context modulates semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Snow, N., & Neely, J. M. (1987, November).Reduction of semantic priming from inclusion of physically or nominally related prime-target pairs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle.Google Scholar
  82. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly,16, 32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stanovich, K. E., Nathan, R. G., West, R., &Valla-Rossi, M. (1985). Children’s word recognition in context: Spreading activation, expectancy, and motivation.Child Development,56, 1418–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention.Memory & Cognition,7, 77–85.Google Scholar
  85. Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1981). The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Test of a two process theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., &Feeman, D. J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second grade children: Tests of an interactive compensatory model.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,32, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990, January). Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., &Leiser, D. (1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 760–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages.Child Development,49, 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilding, J. (1986). Joint effects of semantic priming and repetition in a lexical decision task: Implications for a model of lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 213–228.Google Scholar
  93. Woltz, D. J. (1988). An investigation of the role of working memory in procedural skill acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woltz, D. G. (1990). Repetition of semantic comparisons: Temporary and persistent priming effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest CentreTorontoCanada
  3. 3.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations