Abstract
Paap and Noel’s (1991) recent demonstration that increased memory load facilitates naming of low-frequency irregular words has been taken as strong support for dual-route theories of word naming (e.g., Coltheart, 1978). Others, however, (Jared, personal communication, March 1993; Strain, personal communication, April 1993) have been unable to replicate this effect. In the present research, five different attempts were made to determine the crucial experimental conditions required for successful replication of the Paap and Noel findings. None of these experiments produced results at all similar to those reported by Paap and Noel. A number of explanations for these failures to replicate, in terms of individual differences between Paap and Noel’s subjects and the present subjects, were evaluated. Most of these explanations were not supported by the data. The present results call into question the generalizability of the Paap and Noel findings and, hence, the strength of support they provide for dual-route theories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.
Baron, J., &Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and wordspecific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 386–393.
Bernstein, S. E., & Carr, T. H. (1991, November). Dual route theories of reading: When does a concurrent task facilitate pronunciation? Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.
Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., &Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary?Psychological Review,97, 432–446.
Brown, P., &Besner, D. (1987). The assembly of phonology in oral reading: A new model. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 471–490). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, P., Lupker, S. J., &Colombo, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 537–554.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 674–691.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Herdman, C. M., Beckett, B., & Stolpmann, K. (1993, July). Codespecific interference in phonological recoding: Evidence supporting a dual-route approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Toronto.
Humphreys, G. W., &Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing?An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral & Brain Sciences,8, 689–740.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 166–178.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1993, November).Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Lupker, S. J., &Williams, B. A. (1989). Rhyme priming of pictures and words: A lexical activation account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1033–1046.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model of letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
Paap, K. R., &Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race.Psychological Research,53, 13–24.
Patterson, K., &Coltheart, V. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 421–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.Science,153, 652–654.
Tabossi, P., &Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory & Cognition,20, 303–313.
Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A rows is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., &Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.Psychological Review,97, 488–522.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pexma, P.M., Lupker, S.J. Effects of memory load in a word-naming task: Five failures to replicate. Memory & Cognition 23, 581–595 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197260
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197260