Abstract
Three experiments, based on Mani and Johnson-Laird’s (1982) study, tested memory for spatial descriptions. In Phase 1 of each experiment, subjects judged whether diagrams matched verbal descriptions that were either determinate or indeterminate. In Phase 2, subjects attempted to recognize the descriptions studied in Phase 1. Mani and Johnson-Laird reported a crossover: Gist memory was better for determinate descriptions and verbatim memory was better for indeterminate descriptions. This crossover suggests that mental models are remembered. All three new experiments failed to replicate the crossover, challenging whether models are preservedin episodic memory. It was hypothesized instead that episodic memory records the mental operations by which models are constructed. This hypothesis accounted for the findings of all three experiments. In Experiments 1 and 2, performance varied with the construction-trace overlap between-recognition test descriptions. In Experiment 3, performance was depressed if the order of sentences within descriptions was altered between study and test.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review,85, 249–277.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., &Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: Aconstructive versus interpretive approach.Cognitive Psychology,3, 193–209.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2, 331–350.
Byrne, R. M. J., &Johnson-Lalrd, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 564–575.
Denis, M., &Cucode, M. (1989). Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 293–307.
Ehrlich, K., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 296–306.
Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., &Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models.Memory & Cognition,20, 507–518.
Glenberg, A. M., &Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 129–151.
Glenbero, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1990).Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kolers, P. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 425–449.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mani, K., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions.Memory & Cognition,10, 181–187.
Mcginn, C. (1989).Mental content. Oxford: Blackwell,
Morra, S. (1989). Developmental differences in the use of Verbatim versus spatial representations in the recall of spatial descriptions: A probabilistic model and an experimental analysis.Journal ofMemory & Language,28, 37–55.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Morris, D. G., Bower, G. H., &Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 292–312.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
Newell, A. (1990).Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin,80, 1–24.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1979). Validating computational models: A critique of Anderson’s indeterminacy of representation claim.Psychological Review,86, 383–394.
Pylyshyn, Z. (Ed.) (1987).The robot’s dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Van Duk, T., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Helpful points, at various stages in the life of this research, have been made by Peter Bibby, Ruth Byrne, Alan Collins, Judi Ellis, Sue Gathercole, Phil Johnson-Laird, and Geoff Underwood. Special thanks to Christian Vaughan, whose undergraduate dissertation prompted this research. The experiments reported here were presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society in York, England, in July 1992.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Payne, S.J. Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis. Memory & Cognition 21, 591–603 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197191
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197191