Memory & Cognition

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 440–448 | Cite as

The separability of space and time: Dimensional interaction in the memory trace

  • Addle Dutta
  • James S. Nairne
Article
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

The speeded-classification paradigm, adapted from the study of perceptual interactions, was used to examine interactions among features of the short-term memory trace. In each of four experiments, a trial began with the presentation of a pair of stimuli, each member of which occurred either first or second in time and above or below a fixation point. One of the two stimuli was then presented again, and the task was to classify its prior temporal (Experiments 1 and 3) or spatial (Experiments 2 and 4) position. The main question of interest asked whether subjects could selectively attend to one of these occurrence dimensions while ignoring irrelevant variation along the other. The results suggested that whereas subjects can selectively ignore temporal or spatial variation when no recall of the irrelevant dimension’s value is required, they suffer interference when values on both dimensions must be remembered. The obtained patterns of interference are consistent withpostperceptual interactions of the-spatial and temporal components of the memory trace.

References

  1. Anderson, R. E. (1976). Short-term retention of the where and when of pictures and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,105, 378–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjork, E. L., &Healy, A. F. (1974). Short-term order and item retention.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower, G. H. (1967). A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 229–325). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, K., &Habisi, A. (1991). Contribution of temporal contiguity to the spatial priming effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Healy, A. F. (1975). Coding of temporal-spatial patterns in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Healy, A. F. (1977). Pattern coding of spatial order information in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Healy, A. F. (1982). Short-term memory for order information. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 191–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, G. V. (1976). A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,105, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, C. L., &Estes, W. K. (1977). Order and position in primary memory for letter strings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mandler, G., &Anderson, R. E. (1971). Temporal and spatial cues in seriation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., &Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information.Memory & Cognition,5, 10–16.Google Scholar
  15. Melara, R. D. (1989). Dimensional interaction between color and pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melara, R. D., &Nairne, J. S. (1991). On the nature of interactions between the past and the present.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1124–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.Google Scholar
  19. Nairne, J. S., &Dutta, A. (1992). Spatial and temporal uncertainty in long-term memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, D. C., &Mason, D. A. (1982). Is there evidence for automatic processing of spatial and color attributes present in pictures and words?Memory & Cognition,10, 76–81.Google Scholar
  22. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  24. Sas Institute (1990).SASISTAT user’s guide: Version 6 (4th ed., Vol. 1). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Tulving, E., &Bower, G. H. (1974). The logic of memory representations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 265–301). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tulving, E., &Watkins, M. J. (1975). Structure of memory traces.Psychological Review,82, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., Alba, J. W., Sanft, H., &Rose, K. C. (1984). Is temporal order encoded automatically?Memory & Cognition,12, 387–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Addle Dutta
    • 1
  • James S. Nairne
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest Lafayette

Personalised recommendations