Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 543–557 | Cite as

Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training

  • Douglas R. Needham
  • Ian M. Begg
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Spontaneous analogical transfer is the use of information from one problem to solve another problem, without an explicit hint to use the previous information. The results of five experiments were that if subjects tried to solve a training problem before hearing its solution, or tried to explain a training story’s solution before hearing the correct explanation, spontaneous transfer was more likely than it was if subjects had studied the same training passage for memory before hearing its solution or explanation. The advantage of problem-oriented processing over memory-oriented processing occurred even though solution attempts nearly always failed, and the advantage was not reduced if the target problem was tested 15 min later rather than immediately after training. We propose that problem-oriented processes performed at study are appropriate processes to use at test. Further support for the account comes from subjects’ memory for the training passages; the advantage for problem-oriented processing on solution tasks was mirrored by an equally substantial advantage for the memory-oriented subjects on a recall task.

Download to read the full article text

References

  1. Adams, L. T., Kassehman, J. E., Yearwood, A. A., Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1988). Memory access: The effects of fact-oriented versus problem-oriented acquisition.Memory & Cognition,16, 167–175.Google Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. P. (I960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,51, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassok, M., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 153–166,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg, I. (1976). Acquisition and transfer of meaningful function by meaningless sounds.Canadian Journal of Psychology,30, 178–186.Google Scholar
  5. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 610–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begg, I., &Roe, H. (1988). On the inhibition of reading by generating.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 325–336.Google Scholar
  7. Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., &Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive.Journal of Experimental Psychology! Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowden, E. M. (1985). Accessing relevant information during problem solving: Time constraints on search in the problem space.Memory & Cognition,13, 280–286.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. L., &Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example.Cognitive Psychology,20, 493–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., &Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.Cognitive Science,13, 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncker, K. (1945).On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs,58 (Whole No. 270.)Google Scholar
  14. Fixx, J. (1978).Solve it. New York: Fawcett Popular Library.Google Scholar
  15. Gardner, M. (1978).Aha! Insight. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  16. Gick, M. L,, &Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J, (1983). Schema induction and analogical reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,15, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gleitman, H. (1986).Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Holyoak, K. J., &Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,15, 332–340.Google Scholar
  20. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacoby, L. L., Allan, L. G., Collins, J. C, &Larwux, L. K. (1988). Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &. Cognition,14, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacoby, L. L., &Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,13, 314–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  24. Kane, J. H., &Anderson, R. C. (1978). Depth of processing and interference effects in the teaming and remembering of sentences.Journal of Educational Psychology,70, 626–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keane, M. (1985). On drawing analogies when solving problems: A theory and test of solution generation in an analogical problem-solving task.British Journal of Psychology,76, 449–458.Google Scholar
  26. Levine, M. (1974). A transfer hypothesis, whereby learning-to-learn, Einstellung, the PREE, reversal-nonreversal shifts and other curiosities are elucidated. In R. L, Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology (pp. 289–303). Potomac. MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Lockhart, R. S., Lamon, M., &Gick, M. L. (1988). Conceptual transfer in simple insight problems.Memory & Cognition,16, 36–44.Google Scholar
  28. Majer, N. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness.Journal of Comparative Psychology,12, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning, Longman’s Green, NY: David McKay.Google Scholar
  30. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verba! Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novick, L. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 510–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perpetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem solving context.Memory & Cognition,11, 24–31.Google Scholar
  33. Roediger, H. L., III. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed, S. K., Dempster, A., &Ettinger, M. (1985). Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ross, B. H., Ryan, W. J., &Tenpenny, P. L. (1989). The access of relevant information for solving problems.Memory & Cognition,17, 639–651.Google Scholar
  37. Simon, H. A., &Hayes, J. R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs.Cognitive Psychology,8, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slamecka, N. J., &Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails.Journal of Verbal Learning &. Verbal Behavior,22, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slamecka.N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spencer, R. M., &Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,14, 442–449.Google Scholar
  41. Stein, B. S., Way, K. R., Benningfield, S. E., &Hedgecough, C. A. (1986). Constraints on spontaneous transfer in problem-solving tasks.Memory & Cognition,14, 432–441.Google Scholar
  42. Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallechinsky, D., &Waluce, I. (1978). The people’s almanac 2, New York: Kingsport.Google Scholar
  44. Weisberg, R., Dicamillo, M., &Phillips, D. (1978). Transferring old associations to new problems: A nonautomatic process.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittlf.Sea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., &Girard, K. (1990). Elusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 716–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Witherspoon, D., &Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task.Memory & Cognition,13, 101–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas R. Needham
    • 1
  • Ian M. Begg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations