Abstract
The contribution of assembled phonology to phonological effects in reading comprehension was assessed. In Experiment 1, subjects judged the acceptability of sentences with regular, exception, and nonword homophone substitutions and orthographic controls. Significantly more errors occurred to sentences with regular-word homophones than to exception words, and error rates for nonword homophones were low and not significant. Experiment 2 showed that this was not due to differences in the sentence frames. In Experiment 3, the subjects judged as unacceptable those sentences containing an exception word that sounded correct when read according to spelling-to-sound rules. Significantly higher error rates occurred only for low-frequency exception words. Experiment 4 showed that task conditions affect semantic-categorization error rates for nonword homophones. These results indicate that both assembled and addressed phonology contribute to sentence and word comprehension, but the low error rate for nonwords suggests that an early lexical check may be applied.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 241–246.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In O. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Masterson, J., Byng, S., Prior, M., &Riddoch, J. (1983). Surface dyslexia.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 469–495.
Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., &Trollope, J. (1990). Articulatory suppression and phonological codes in reading for meaning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 375–399.
Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., Rickard, M., &Elton, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,14, 387–397.
Doctor, E. A. (1978).Studies in reading comprehension in children and adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
Edgington, E. S. (1987).Randomization tests (2nd ed). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ellis, A. E., Miller, D., &Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke’s aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology.Cognition,15, 111–144.
Hofland, K., &Johansson, S. (1982).Word frequencies in British and American English. London: Longman.
Howard, D., &Franklin, S. (1987). Three ways for understanding written words, and their use in two contrasting cases of surface dyslexia (together with an odd routine for making ‘orthographic’ errors in oral word production). In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, rending and writing (pp. 340–366). London: Academic Press.
Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In A. Allport, D. O. Mackay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, rending and writing (pp. 273–311). London: Academic Press.
Patterson, K. E. (1982). The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 77–112). London: Erlbaum.
Patterson, K. (1986). Lexical but nonsemantic spelling?Cognitive Neuropsychology,3, 341–367.
Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.) (1985).Surface dyslexia: Cognitive neuropsychological studies of phonological reading. London: Erlbaum.
Treiman, R., Freyd, J. J., &Baron, J. (1983). Phonological recoding and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 682–700.
Uyeda, K. M., &Mandler, G. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 587–595.
Van Orden, G. C. (1984).A ROWS is a /IROZ/ is a ROSE: Visual, phonological, developmental, and strategic influences upon lexical access. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego, San Diego.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). AROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C. (1991). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 77–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spellng to sound to meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,14, 371–386.
Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., &Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks.Memory & Cognition,12, 293–305.
Weber, R. M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors.Reading Research Quarterly,5, 427–451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by an Inner London Education Authority Research Fellowship held by J. Masterson, and ARGS/ARC Grant A78715724 to V. Coltheart.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coltheart, V., Avons, S.E., Masterson, J. et al. The role of assembled phonology in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition 19, 387–400 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197143
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197143