Abstract
Glenberg (1984) and others have theorized that greater recency effects are obtained with auditory as opposed to visual presentation because of greater temporal distinctiveness of items in auditory sequences. We tested a number of ways of enhancing visual distinctiveness, including the use of color, spatial location, and minimized visual interference. None of the seven experiments provided any evidence of improved recall from enhanced visual distinctiveness. In particular, no increase in recency effects was obtained with increased distinctiveness. Additional analyses of pairwise dependency in recall across serial positions also failed to show any evidence of the near-independence of recall of the terminal item that characterizes recall of auditory sequences. Visual-perceptual distinctiveness does not get mapped in any simple way onto memorial distinctiveness in an immediate-serial-recall task.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Battacchi, M, W., Pelamatti, G. M., &Umiltà, C. (1990). Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.Memory & Cognition,18, 651–658.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 1–15.
Crowder, R. G. (1986). Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 268–278.
Crowder, R. O., &Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics,5, 365–373.
Glenberg, A. M. (1984). A retrieval account of the long-term modality account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 231–255.
Glenberg, A. M. (1987). Temporal context and recency. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 173–191). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glenberg, A. M. (1990). Common processes underlie enhanced renceny effects for auditory and changing-state stimuli.Memory & Cognition,18, 638–650.
Glenberg, A. M., Eberhardt, K. A., &Belden, T. M. (1987). The role of visual interference in producing the long-term modality effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 504–510.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15.
Hitch, G. J. (1975). The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.Memory & Cognition,3, 501–505.
Hitch, G., &Morton, J. (1975). The unimportance of explicit spatial information in serial recall of visually presented lists.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 161–164.
Jensen, A. R. (1980).Bias in menial testing. New York: The Free Press.
Kallman, H. J., &Cameron, P. (1989). Enhanced recency effects with changing-state and primary-linguistic stimuli.Memory & Cognition,17, 318–328.
Madigan, S. A. (1971). Modality and recall order interactions in short-term memory for serial order.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 294–296.
Morton, J. N. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1968). Serial order effects in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(Suppl., Pt. 2), 1–15.
Nairne, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall.Memory & Cognition,16, 343–352.
Penney, C. O. (1989), Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.Memory & Cognition,17, 398–422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDowd, J., Madigan, S. Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall. Memory & Cognition 19, 371–377 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197141
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197141