Abstract
The development of contextual dependencies during motor skill acquisition was examined. Environmental context was varied along intentional and incidental dimensions. Intentional stimuli were defined as essential for achieving skilled performance, whereas incidental stimuli were defined as those that have the potential to become associated with specific tasks due to their selective presence in the learning environment. Experiment 1 demonstrated the occurrence of contextual dependencies for the learning of four-key typing sequences. Contextual dependencies were diminished in Experiment 2 when the number of keys used in the sequences was reduced. In Experiment 3, a retention condition was incorporated, in which both the intentional and the incidental stimuli were not available; this confirmed that task difficulty mediated the development of contextual dependencies. These findings are discussed with respect to the incorporation of environmental contextual stimuli with memorial representations of movement information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Dulsky, S. G. (1935). The effect of a change of background on recall and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 725–740.
Eich, J. E., Weingartner, H., Stillman, R. C., &Gillin, J. C. (1975). State dependent accessibility of retrieval cues in the retention of a categorized list.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 408–417.
Lee, T. D. (1988). Transfer-appropriate processing: A framework for conceptualizing practice in motor learning. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.),Complex movement behaviour: “The” motor-actioncontroversy (pp. 201–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (North-Holland).
Lee, T. D., &Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of the contextual interference in motor skill acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 730–746.
Lintern, G. (1985). Context and dependency effects in skill acquisition. In R. Eberts & C. G. Eberts (Eds.),Trends in ergonomics/human factors II (pp. 249–256). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (North-Holland).
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Reed, H. J. (1931). The influence of a change of condition upon the amount recalled.Journal of Experimental Psychology,14, 632–649.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., &Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal.Psychological Bulletin,95, 355–386.
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., &Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 352–359.
Schwartz, B., &Barsky, S. F. (1977). The home advantage.Social Forces,55, 641–661.
Silva, J. M., Andrew, A., & Richey, S. (1983).Game location and basketball performance variation. Paper presented at the annual conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, East Lansing, MI.
Smith, S., &Guthrie, E. R. (1924).General psychology in terms of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.
Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). New York: Wiley.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., &Bjore, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Stelmach, G. E. (1969). Efficiency of motor learning as a function of intertrial rest.Research Quarterly,40, 198–202.
Underwood, B. J., Ham, M., &Ekstrand, B. R. (1962). Cue selection in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 405–409.
Varca, P. (1980). An analysis of home and away game performance of male college basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,2, 245–257.
Vela, E. (1984).Memory as a function of environmental context. Paper presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Southwest Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
Watkins, M. J., Ho, E., &Tulving, E. (1976). Context effects in recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 505–518.
Winstein, C. J., &Schhidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 677–691.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, D.L., Shea, C.H. Contextual dependencies in motor skills. Memory & Cognition 19, 361–370 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197140
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197140