Abstract
In three experiments, subjects learned two lists under incidental conditions and were then given either a part-word or a word (extralist associate) cue. Each cue was related to one word in each list. Halfthe subjects were given production instructions (an indirect memory test), and half were given cued recall instructions (a direct memory test). When the interval between List 2 and the test was shortened, recency effects were found for part-word cues for both cuedrecall and production instructions. Little or no recency effects were found with word cues. These results are incompatible with a simple distinction between the types of memory trace or information-t-hat-are tapped by direct as opposed to indirect memory tasks. Possible causes for the recency effect and for the difference between word and part-word cues are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review,79, 97–123.
Bilodeau, E. A. (1967). Experimental interference with primary associates and their subsequent recovery with rest.Journal ofExperimental Psychology,73, 328–332.
Glenbero, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., &Renzalgia, G. J. (1983). Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 231–255.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 510–518.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations.Journal of Expen mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 45–53.
Graf, P., Squire, L. R., &Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 164–178.
Humphreys, M. S., &Bain, J. D. (1985). Effect of retention interval on the cue repetition effect.American Journal of Psychology,98, 559–568.
Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.
Humphreys, M. S., &Galbraith, R. C. (1975). Forward and backward associations in cued recall: Predictions from the encoding specificity principle.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,1, 702–710.
Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., & Bain, J. D. (in press). Memory retrieval with two cues: Think of intersecting sets. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: A Silver Jubilee. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,3, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Hollingshead, A. (1990). Toward a generate-recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 433–454.
Kirsner, K., Milech, D., &Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon.Memory & Cognition,11, 621–630.
McKenzie, W. A. (1990).Recency effects in cued recall and production: Support for a common retrieval process. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive psychology: The Tulane Flowenee Symposium on Cognition (pp. 369–388). New York: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., &Keelean, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Effects of retention interval and modality on sensory and semantic trace information.Memory & Cognition,7, 257–262.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 475–543.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Rundus, D. (1977). Maintenance rehearsal and single level processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 665–682.
Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1984). Paired associate learning and priming effects in amnesia: A neuropsychological study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 556–570.
Thomson, D. M., Meredith, S. G., &Browning, C. J. (1976).Monash free association norms. Monash University, Department of Psychology, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Tulving, E. (1976). Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 37–73). London: Wiley.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Underwood, B. J. (1948). “Spontaneous” recovery of verbal associates.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 429–439.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The first two experiments constituted part of the first author’s Master’s thesis at the University of Queensland. They and the third experiment were supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenzie, W.A., Humphreys, M.S. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks. Memory & Cognition 19, 321–331 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197135
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197135