Abstract
In two experiments involving a total of 542 subjects, a series of slides depicting a burglary was shown. After the initial event, subjects were exposed to one or more narratives about the event that contained some misinformation or neutral information about four critical details. Finally, subjects were tested on their memories of what they saw, and their reaction times and confidence levels were measured. When subjects took a standard test in which the misinformation item was a possible response option, they responded very quickly and confidently when making this incorrect choice. Misled subjects responded as quickly and confidently to these “unreal” memories as they did to their genuine memories. It does not seem, then, that the misinformation effect arises from a large proportion of subjects who must resolve a conflict between two memories when they are tested, a conflict that would be expected to take time. When subjects took a modified test in which the misinformation item was not a possible response, misled subjects were as accurate as were controls, but they responded more slowly, regardless of whether they ultimately chose the right or wrong option. These findings indicate that misinformation does introduce some form of interference not detected by a simple test of accuracy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 261–295.
Anderson, J. R. (1985).Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Belli, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses.Memory & Cognition,16, 314–326.
Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 72–85.
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (1988). Memory 1ocl of suggestibility development: Comment on Ceci, Ross, & Toglia (1987).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 197–200.
Ceci, S. J., &Ross, D. F., &Toglia, M. P. (1987a). Age differences in suggestibility: Narrowing the uncertainties. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children’s eyewimess memory (pp. 79–91). New York: Springer.
Ceci, S. J., Ross, D F., &Toglia, M. P. (1987b). Suggestibility of children’s memory: Psycholegal implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 38–49.
Ceci, S. J., Toglia, M. P., &Ross, D. F. (1988). On remembering more or less: A trace strength interpretation of developmental differences in suggestibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 201–203.
Chandler, C. C. (1989). Specific retroactive interference in modified recognition tests: Evidence for an unknown cause of interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 256–265.
Cole, W. G., &Loftus, E. F. (1979). Incorporating new information into memory.American Journal of Psychology,92, 413–425.
Geiselman, R. E. (1988). Improving eyewitness memory through mental reinstatement of context. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 245–266). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Gibling, F., &Davies, G. (1988). Reinstatement of context following exposure to post-event information.British Journal of Psychology,79, 129–141.
Greene, E., Flynn, M., &Loftus, E. F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 207–219.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1986). The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and acqmescence: Empirical findings and the theoretical implicationsPersonality & Individual Differences,7, 195–199.
Hammersley, R., &Read, J. D. (1986). What is integration? Remembering a story and remembering false implications about the story.British Journal of Psychology,77, 329–341.
Johnson, M. K (1987). Discriminating the origin of information. In T. F. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher (Eds.),Delusional beliefs: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 34–65). New York: Wiley.
Johnson, M. K., &Hasher, L. (1987). Human learning and memory.Annual Review of Psychology,38, 631–668.
Kohnken, G., &Brockmann, C. (1987). Unspecific postevent information, attribution of responsibility, and eyewitness performance.Applied Cognitive Psychology,1, 197–207.
Kroll, N. E. A., &Ogawa, K. H. (1988). Retrieval of the irretrievable: The effect of sequential information on response bias. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 490–495). New York: Wdey.
Lewis, C H., &Anderson, J. R. (1976). Interference with real world knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,7, 311–335.
Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1987). Reality monitoring and suggestibility: Children’s ability to discriminate among memories from different sources. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),ChiMren’s eyewitness memory (pp. 92–121). New York: Springer.
Loftus, E. F. (1989). Distortions in eyewitness memory from postevent information. In H. Wegener, F. Losel, & J. Halsch (Eds.),Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 242–253). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Loftus, E. F., &Hoffman, H. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,118, 100–104.
Loftus, E. F., Korf, N., &Schooler, J W. (1989). Misinformation and memory. In J. Yuille (FA.),Credibility assessment: A theoretical and research perspective (pp. 155–173). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a wsual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypothesesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 1–16.
Morton, J., Hammersley, R. H., &Bekerian, D. A. (1985). Headed records: A model for memory and its failures.Cognition,20, 1–23.
Register, P. A., &Kihlstrom, J. F. (1988). Hypnosis and interrogative suggestibility.Personality & Individual Differences,9, 549–558.
Schooler, J. W., Clark, C. A., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Knowing when memory is real. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 83–88). New York: Wiley.
Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 171–181.
Sheehan, P. W., &Tilden, J. (1986). The consistency of occurrences of memory distortion following hypnotic induction.International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis,34, 122–137.
Smith, V. L., &Elisworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 294–300.
Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information.Memory & Cognition,14, 329–338.
Tversky, B., &Tuchin, M. (1989). A reconcdiation of the evidence on eyewitness testimony: Comments on McCloskey & Zaragoza (1985).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 86–91.
Wagenaar, W. A., &Boer, H. P. A. (1987). Misleading postevent reformation: Testing parameterized models of integration in memory.Acta Psychologica,66, 291–306.
Wells, G. L., &Turtle, J. W. (1987). Eyewitness testimony research: Current knowledge and emergent controversies.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,19, 363–388.
Zaragoza, M. S., &Koshmider, J. W. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 246–255.
Zaragoza, M. S., McCloskey, M., &Jamis, M. (1987). Misleading postevent information and recall of the original event: Further evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 36–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Science Foundation.
Robert Belli provided enormously helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loftus, E.F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H.G. et al. Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory & Cognition 17, 607–616 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197083
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197083