Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the referential term on the horizontal dimension corresponds to the dominant hand and whether the referential term on the vertical dimension is independent of handedness. In order to verify the hypothesis, right-handers, left-handers, and ambidextrous subjects were required to verify and falsify statements including the words ABOVE and BELOW and the words LEFT and RIGHT. The results showed that right-handers were faster in verifying and falsifying the statements containing the term RIGHT, whereas left handers were faster in verifying and falsifying those containing the term LEFT. Ambidextrous subjects, however, showed no sign of asymmetry in the positional judgments of stimuli along the horizontal dimension. By contrast, right-handers, left-handers, and ambidextrous subjects were equally faster in verifying and falsifying the statements containing the term ABOVE than the statements containing the term BELOW. The relation between the positive term on the horizontal dimension and the dominant hand can be explained by the fact that, in the absence of any asymmetries in the physical world, the dominant hand can furnish a natural reference direction for judgments related to this dimension.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Annet, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis.British Journal of Psychology,61, 303–321.
Benton, A. L. (1959).Right-left discrimination and finger vocalization. Development and pathology. New York: Hoeber-Harper.
Chase, W. G., &Clark, H. H. (1971). Semantics in the perception of vercallty.British Journal of Psychology,63, 311–326.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E.Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
Corballis, M. C., &Beale, I. L. (1976).The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Farrell, W. S. (1979). Coding left and right.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 42–51.
Gesell, A., &Ames, L. B. (1947). The development of handedness.Journal of Genetic Psychology,70, 155–175.
Hill, S. D., McCullum, A. H., &Sceau, A. G. (1963). Relation of training in motor activity to development of right-left directionality m mentally retarded children: Exploratory study.Perceptual & Motor Skills,24, 363–366.
Làdavas, E., &Moscovitch, M. (1984). Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 205–215
Maki.R. H., Grandy, C. A., &Hauge, G. (1979). Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 52–67.
Olson, G. M., &Laxar, K. (1973). Asymmetries in processing the terms “right” and “left.”Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 284–290.
Olson, G. M., &Laxar, K. (1974). Processing the terms “right” and “left” A note on left-handers.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 1135–1137.
Sekiyama, K. (1982). Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identaficataon of left and right hands.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 89–95
Seymour, P. H. K. (1969) Response latencies in judgements of spatial location.British Journal of Psychologv,60, 31–39.
Seymour, P. H. K. (1974). Stroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages m a sentence-picture comparison taskMemory & Cognition,2, 19–26
Sholl, M. J, &Egeth, H. E. (1981). Right-left confusion in the adult A verbal labeling effectMemory & Cognition,9, 339–350
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response codeJournal of Experimental Psychology,93, 163–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a leave grant from CNR-NATO to E. Làdavas and by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Grant A8347 to Morris Moscovitch.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Làdavas, E. Asymmetries in processing horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory & Cognition 16, 377–382 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197049
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197049