Abstract
A total of 978 subjects, in two experiments and two pilot studies, were asked to recognize the color of objects to which they had been exposed in a slide presentation. Taken together, the studies demonstrate that an object’s typical coloration influences recognitions, resulting in retrievals that compromise or blend the actual color and the typical color. In addition, Experiment 2 suggests that color recognitions may be simultaneously influenced by typical knowledge, event information, and postevent information. The findings question the adequacy of both the deliberate compromise and the compromise memory hypotheses as accounts for color blend retrievals. The deliberate compromise hypothesis fails to account for evidence that blend retrievals result because an intact representation of an event is not available at the time of test. The compromise memory hypothesis fails to account for evidence that deliberative processes do occur, and is in need of further exposition given that blend retrievals may be the result of different processes when resulting from typical knowledge and from postevent information. In conclusion, neither hypothesis, in isolation, is able to account for the various possible processes that appear responsible for blend retrievals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study tn experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bekerian, D. A., &Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 139–145.
Brewer, W. F., &Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brewer, W. F., &Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.Cognitive Psychology,13, 207–230.
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., &Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 73–86.
Cohen, R. L. (1966). Effect of verbal labels on recall of a visually perceived simple figure: Recognition vs. reproduction.Perceptual & Motor Skills,23, 859–862.
Crosland, H. R. (1921). A qualitative analysis of the process of forgetting.Psychological Monographs,29(Whole No. 130).
Daniel, T. C. (1972). Nature of the effect of verbal labels on recognition memory for form.Journal of Experimental Psychology,96, 152–157.
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 316–355.
Graesser, A. C., Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J., &Smith, D. A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions In scripted activities.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 503–515.
Helson, H., &Lansford, T. (1970). The role of spectral energy of source and background color in the pleasantness of object colors.Applied Optics,9, 1513–1562.
Kuppers, H. (1973).Color: Origin, systems, uses (F Bradley, Trans.). London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report.Cognitive Psychology,7, 560–572.
Loftus, E. F. (1977). Shifting human color memory.Memory & Cognition,5, 696–699.
Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G, &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic ~ntegration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
Loftus, E. F., Schooler, J. W., &Wagenaar, W. A. (1985). The fate of memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 375–380.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985a). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 1–16.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985b). Postevent information and memory. Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 381–387.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York McGraw-Hill.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge m memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
Schank, R., &Abelson, R. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Verity, E. (1980).Color observed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Weinberg, H. I., Wadsworth, J., &Baron, R. S. (1983). Demand and the impact of leading questions on eyewitness testimony.Memory & Cognition,11, 101–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Pilot Study 1 was based on research conducted in partial fultillment of the degree of Master of Arts in psychology at the State University of New York at Geneseo, and was presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, April 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belli, R.F. Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses?. Memory & Cognition 16, 314–326 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197042
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197042