Skip to main content

Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading

Abstract

Potential conceptual processing difficulties associated with abbreviating the duration of eye fixations during reading were explored using a rapid sequential visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm in which each word of a text was briefly presented (for as little as 86 msec) at a fixed location. Question answering and accuracy of summaries associated with RSVP were found to be inferior to performance obtained when subjects skimmed conventionally presented passages. RSVP performance was enhanced by inserting brief pauses between sentences. The pauses produced only minor changes in the perceptual characteristics of RSVP, but they probably allowed subjects to more readily process information that had been buffered in working memory. These results imply that eye fixation durations in conventional reading reflect the time constraints of conceptual processing operations (as well as constraints of planning and initiating eye movements), but also that these conceptual operations may be distributed over later fixations and even postponed until a syntactic boundary is reached.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.

    Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Masson, M. E. J.What eye fixations tell us about speed-reading, skimming, and normal reading. Manuscript in preparation, 1983.

  2. 2.

    Masson, M. E. J., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A.Comprehension of gist and details by speed-readers, skimmers, and normal readers. Manuscript in preparation, 1983.

  3. 3.

    Juola, J. F., Cocklin, T., Chen, H. -C., & Granaas, M.Effects of segment size and structure on reading RSVP text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, November 1982.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., &Scarborough, H. S. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, D. C., &Tinker, M. A. The fixational pause of the eyes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939,15, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett, F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, H. -C. Comprehension and memory in reading rapidserial presentations of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1982.

  6. Dooling, D. J., &Lachman, R. Effects of comprehension on retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischler, I., &Bloom, P. A. Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson, E. J., &Levin, H. The psychology of reading. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green, D. W., Mitchell, D. C., &Hammond, E. J. The scheduling of text integration processes in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Intraub, H. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 604–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarvella, R. J. Immediate memory and discourse processing. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Juola, J. F., Ward, N., &McNamara, T. Visual search and reading rapid, serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review, 1980,117, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., &Woolley, J. D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kieras, D. E. Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kieras, D. E. The role of major referents and sentence topics in the construction of passage macrostructure.Discourse Processes, 1981,4, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kintsch, W., &van Dijk, T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson, M. E. J. Cognitive processes in skimming stories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982,8, 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, J. R., &Kintsch, W. Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell, D. C., &Green, D. W. The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 609–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortony, A. Remembering, understanding, and representation.Cognitive Science, 1978,2, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perfetti, C. A., &Lesgold, A. M. Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Potter, M. C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., &Harris, C. Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poulton, E. C. Time for reading and memory.British Journal of Psychology, 1958,49, 230–245.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poulton, E. C. Rapid reading.Journal of Documentation, 1963,19, 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rayner, K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 618–660.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Swwiaczek, M. L., &Bertera, J. H. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 167–179.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rayner, K., &McConkie, G. W. What guides a reader’s eye movements?Vision Research, 1976,16, 829–837.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rayner, K.,&McConkie, G. W. Perceptual processes in reading: The perceptual spans. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control.Quarterly Journal of experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reed, A. V. Microcomputer display timing: Problems and solutions.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1979,11, 572–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Salthouse, T. A., &Ellis, C. L. Determinants of eye-fixation duration.American Journal of Psychology, 1980,93, 207–234.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salthouse, T. A., Ellis, C. L., Diener, D. C., &Somberg, B. L. Stimulus processing during eye fixations.Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sticht, T. G. Comprehending reading at work. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor, S. E. An evaluation of forty-one trainees who had recently completed the “Reading Dynamics” program. In E. P. Bliesmer & R. C. Staiger (Eds.),Eleventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Milwaukee: National Reading Conference, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thibadeau, R., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. A model of the time course and content of reading.Cognitive Science, in press.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. J. Masson.

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by Grant A7910 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by grants from the University of Victoria.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Masson, M.E.J. Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition 11, 262–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196973

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fixation Duration
  • Reading Rate
  • Question Answering
  • Conceptual Processing
  • Presentation Duration