Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading

  • Open Access
  • Published: 06 August 2013
  • volume 11, pages 262–274 (1983)
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading
Download PDF
  • Michael E. J. Masson1 
  • 2586 Accesses

  • 76 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

  • Cite this article

Abstract

Potential conceptual processing difficulties associated with abbreviating the duration of eye fixations during reading were explored using a rapid sequential visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm in which each word of a text was briefly presented (for as little as 86 msec) at a fixed location. Question answering and accuracy of summaries associated with RSVP were found to be inferior to performance obtained when subjects skimmed conventionally presented passages. RSVP performance was enhanced by inserting brief pauses between sentences. The pauses produced only minor changes in the perceptual characteristics of RSVP, but they probably allowed subjects to more readily process information that had been buffered in working memory. These results imply that eye fixation durations in conventional reading reflect the time constraints of conceptual processing operations (as well as constraints of planning and initiating eye movements), but also that these conceptual operations may be distributed over later fixations and even postponed until a syntactic boundary is reached.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Reference Notes

  1. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Masson, M. E. J.What eye fixations tell us about speed-reading, skimming, and normal reading. Manuscript in preparation, 1983.

  2. Masson, M. E. J., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A.Comprehension of gist and details by speed-readers, skimmers, and normal readers. Manuscript in preparation, 1983.

  3. Juola, J. F., Cocklin, T., Chen, H. -C., & Granaas, M.Effects of segment size and structure on reading RSVP text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, November 1982.

References

  • Aaronson, D., &Scarborough, H. S. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. C., &Tinker, M. A. The fixational pause of the eyes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939,15, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. -C. Comprehension and memory in reading rapidserial presentations of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1982.

  • Dooling, D. J., &Lachman, R. Effects of comprehension on retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, I., &Bloom, P. A. Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., &Levin, H. The psychology of reading. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. W., Mitchell, D. C., &Hammond, E. J. The scheduling of text integration processes in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intraub, H. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 604–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella, R. J. Immediate memory and discourse processing. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juola, J. F., Ward, N., &McNamara, T. Visual search and reading rapid, serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review, 1980,117, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., &Woolley, J. D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. The role of major referents and sentence topics in the construction of passage macrostructure.Discourse Processes, 1981,4, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., &van Dijk, T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. Cognitive processes in skimming stories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982,8, 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R., &Kintsch, W. Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. C., &Green, D. W. The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 609–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A. Remembering, understanding, and representation.Cognitive Science, 1978,2, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., &Lesgold, A. M. Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., &Harris, C. Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. Time for reading and memory.British Journal of Psychology, 1958,49, 230–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. Rapid reading.Journal of Documentation, 1963,19, 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 618–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Swwiaczek, M. L., &Bertera, J. H. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 167–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &McConkie, G. W. What guides a reader’s eye movements?Vision Research, 1976,16, 829–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K.,&McConkie, G. W. Perceptual processes in reading: The perceptual spans. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control.Quarterly Journal of experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. V. Microcomputer display timing: Problems and solutions.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1979,11, 572–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., &Ellis, C. L. Determinants of eye-fixation duration.American Journal of Psychology, 1980,93, 207–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., Ellis, C. L., Diener, D. C., &Somberg, B. L. Stimulus processing during eye fixations.Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T. G. Comprehending reading at work. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. An evaluation of forty-one trainees who had recently completed the “Reading Dynamics” program. In E. P. Bliesmer & R. C. Staiger (Eds.),Eleventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Milwaukee: National Reading Conference, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibadeau, R., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. A model of the time course and content of reading.Cognitive Science, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, V8W 2Y2, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    Michael E. J. Masson

Authors
  1. Michael E. J. Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by Grant A7910 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by grants from the University of Victoria.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Masson, M.E.J. Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition 11, 262–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196973

Download citation

  • Received: 25 August 1982

  • Accepted: 23 December 1982

  • Published: 06 August 2013

  • Issue Date: May 1983

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196973

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Fixation Duration
  • Reading Rate
  • Question Answering
  • Conceptual Processing
  • Presentation Duration

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature