Bellezza, F. S., & Day, J. C.The alphabet mnemonic and visual imagery mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, Penn, November 1981.
Anderson, J. R. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 249–277.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C. Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. Lesgold, J. Pellegrino, S. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.),Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum, 1979.
Google Scholar
Bobrow, D. G., &Norman, D. A. Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, 1975
Google Scholar
Bower, G. H. Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. Gregg (Ed.),Cognition in learning and memory. New York: Wiley, 1972.
Google Scholar
Horowitz, L. M., &Prytulak, L. S. Redintegrative memory.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 519–531.
Article
Google Scholar
Jonides, J., Kahn, R., &Rozin, P. Imagery instructions improve memory in blind subjects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,5, 424–426.
Google Scholar
Kirk, R. E.
Experimental design procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth, 1968.
Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M.
Image and Mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M., &Pomerantz, J. R. Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 52–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Minsky, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Google Scholar
Montague, W. F. Elaborative strategies in verbal learning and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6), New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Google Scholar
Neisser, U.
Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
Google Scholar
Paivio, A. Mental imagery in associative learning.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 241–263.
Article
Google Scholar
Paivio, A.
Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Google Scholar
Paivio, A. Images, propositions, and knowledge. In J. M. Nichols (Ed.),Images, perception, and knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing, 1977.
Google Scholar
Paivio, A. A dual coding approach to perception and cognition. In H. L. Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.),Models of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1968,76(1, Pt. 2).
Palmer, S. E. Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.),Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,80, 1–24
Article
Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., &Ortony, A. The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Google Scholar
Ryle, G.
The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.
Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. Language and memory.Cognitive Science, 1980,4, 243–284.
Article
Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. P.
Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Google Scholar
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F.
Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.
The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications, 1944.
Google Scholar
Wollen, K. A., Weber, A., &Lowry, D. H. Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 518–522.
Article
Google Scholar