Abstract
Four experiments consider the role of semantic category information in word identification using a serial classification reaction time paradigm. Experimental variables were manipulated by varying the semantic properties of blocks of trials and the target search instructions. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 investigated the facilitation on target word recognition of manipulating the categorical homogeneity of the nontarget words. An homogeneous nontarget set facilitated the classification of unrelated target words. This category contrast effect was obtained in all conditions, although its magnitude depended upon target search instructions. Experiment 3 also investigated whether word identification was inhibited if subjects were prevented from utilizing the category information to distinguish target from nontarget words. Target and nontarget word identification was slower under such conditions. Experiment 4 demonstratd that both the category contrast and category interference effects were dependent upon the use of short response-stimulus intervals to define a functional semantic background. This suggests the category effects are perceptual in nature. Current models of word recognition cannot easily explain the findings. A committee decision model is outlined to accommodate the data; the model proposes that visual analysis, identification, and categorization proceed in parallel.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G.Activation of lexical memory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1972.
References
Allport, D. A. On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut Category Norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph 1969,80(3 Pt. 2).
Becker, C. A. Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 493–512.
Bertelson, P. Sequential redundancy and speed in a two-choice responding task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,12, 90–102.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 407–428.
Fischler, I., &Goodman, G. O. Latency of activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 455–470.
Fletcher, B. (C). Alphanumeric category effects: Evidence against the sufficiency of a localization explanation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 347–352. (a)
Fletcher, B. (C). Wholistic and analytic stimulus processing; The development of selective perceptual strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 167–176. (b)
Fletcher, B. (C). &Rabbitt, P. M. A. The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection in a two-choice reaction time task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 417–427.
Hale, D. J. Sequential effects in a two-choice serial reaction task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,19, 133–141.
Henderson, L. Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press, 1982.
Henderson, L., &Chard, J. Semantic effects in visual work detection with visual similarity controlled.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 290–298.
Karlin, M. B., &Bower, G. H. Semantic effects in visual word search.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 417–424.
Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: The effects of visual masking on word processing.Cognitive Psychology, in press.
Marcel, A. J., &Forrin, B. Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 450–460.
Marcel, A. J., &Patterson, K. Word recognition and Production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
McClelland, J. L. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review, 1979,86, 287–330.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V London: Academic Press, 1975.
Posner, M. I., Boies, S. J., Eichelman, W. H., &Taylor, R. L. Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79, 1–16.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Rodgers, B. What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977,29, 727–743.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Vyas, S. What is repeated in the “repetition effect”? In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Vyas, S. Processing a display even after you make a response to it. How perceptual errors can be corrected.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 223–239.
Rumelhart, D. E. Toward an interactive model of reading. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. London: Wiley, 1977.
Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review, 1982,89, 60–94.
Schaeffer, B., &Wallace, R. The comparison of word meanings.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 144–152.
Schuberth, R. E., &Eimas, P. D. Effects of context on the classification of words and non-words.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 27–36.
Schvaneveldt, R. M., &McDonald, J. E. Semantic context and encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 673–687.
Taylor, D. A. Identification and categorization of letters and digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 423–439.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The work was done while the author was at the Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, supported by the Medical Research Council. The contribution of P. M. A. Rabbitt was invaluable. The particularly helpful comments of an anonymous reviewer are also acknowledged. Experiment 3 of this paper was presented to the Experimental Psychology Society in April 1976. The work formed a substantial component of a paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, April 1982.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher, B.(. The role of category information in word identification: A parallel decision model. Memory & Cognition 11, 237–250 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196970
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196970