Abstract
Subjects learned paired associate fists in which word triads were paired with nouns to a partial criterion; they were then given both an immediate and a 1-week delayed recognition test for discrimination among the triads and a cued recall test. Recall after 1 week was slightly poorer than that occurring immediately, but it was unaffected by various patterns of element identity among the triads. Discrimination improved somewhat over the 1-week interval. Further experiments showed that the immediate test was responsible for both reducing forgetting and improving discrimination, but both effects were independent of identity structure. Forgetting cannot be attributed to loss of differentiation of cues.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., &Estes, W. K. Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 463–470.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. New York: Winston-Wiley, 1973.
Banks, W. P. Signal detection theory and human memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 81–89.
Battig, W. F. Facilitation and interference. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.),Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
Ellis, H. C., &Daniel, T. C. Verbal processes in long-term stimulus recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 18–26.
Gibson, E. J. A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning.Psychological Review, 1940,47, 196–229.
Gotz, A., &Jacoby, L. L. Encoding and retrieval processes in long-term retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 291–297.
Greenberg, R., &Underwood, B. J. Retention as a function of stage of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950,40, 452–457.
Greeno, J. G., Janes, C. T., &Da Polito, F. J. A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 331–345.
Irion, A. L. The relation of set to retention.Psychological Review, 1948,55, 336–341.
Irion, A. L. Retention and warming-up effects in paired associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949,39, 669–675.
Joinson, P. A., &Runquist, W. N. Effects of intralist stimulus similarity and degree of learning on forgetting.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 554–559.
Martin, E., Fleming, F. G., &Nally, P. D. Effects of temporal locus of a recitation attempt on learning and retention.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 274–282.
Nelson, D. L., Brooks, D. H., &Wheeler, J. W. Sensory and meaning features in stimulus recognition and associative retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,104, 711–719.
Postman, L. Transfer, interference, and forgetting. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.),Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt-Rinehart-Winston, 1971.
Richardson, J., &Underwood, B. J. Comparing retention of verbal lists after different rates of acquisition.Journal of General Psychology, 1957,56, 187–192.
Runquist, W. N. Intralist interference and similarity. In C. P. Duncan, L. Sechrest, & A. W. Melton (Eds.),Human memory: Festschrift in honor of Benton J. Underwood. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Runquist, W. N. Conditional recall and bias memory experiments.American Journal of Psychology, 1973,86, 351–360.
Runquist, W. N. The assessment of discriminative encoding in paired associate learning.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 472–478.
Runquist, W. N. Interference among memory traces.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 143–159. (a)
Runquist, W. N. Stimulus structure, discrimination, and interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,104, 491–500. (b)
Runquist, W. N. Physical similarity and stimulus recognition: Interference could still be associative.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 32–36.
Runquist, W. N., &Sekulich, C. Transfer of stimulus differentiation and perceptual selection rules.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979,5, 326–336.
Runquist, W. N., &Snyder, R. A. Forgetting of verbal paired associates after low degrees of learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 435–447.
Thompson, C. P., Wenger, S. K., &Bartling, C. A. How recall facilitates subsequent recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 210–221.
Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. Availability vs. accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 381–391.
Tulving, E., &Watkins, M. J. On negative transfer: Effects of testing one list on the recall of another.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 181–193.
Underwood, B. J. An evaluation of the Gibson theory of verbal learning. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.),Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hil, 1961.
Underwood, B. J. Degree of learning and the measurement of forgetting.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 112–129.
Underwood, B. J. The role of association in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 917–939.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant A088 from the National Research Council of Canada. James Tousignant, Caroline Renney, and Carrie MacWilliams aided in the collection of the data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Runquist, W.N., Renney, L. & Biersdorff, K. Cue discrimination and forgetting. Memory & Cognition 9, 317–323 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196965
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196965