Abstract
Two experiments examined whether people expecting recall are, compared with people expecting recognition, more likely to form associations between semantically related words in a list of to-be-remembered words. People were induced to expect either a recall or a recognition test on a critical list that included three conditions of semantic organization. Words in the unrelated (U) condition were semantically unrelated to all other words on the list, whereas words in the two related conditions were semantically related to one other list word. In the related-spaced (R-S) condition, the two related words appeared in input positions separated by 5-11 other items, whereas in the related-massed (R-M) condition, they appeared in adjacent input positions. Different groups received either an expected or unexpected recall (Experiment 1) or recognition (Experiment 2) test on the critical list. In both recall and recognition, (l) people expecting recall did better than those expecting recognition, (2) memory was worst for U words, next best for R-S words, and best for R-M words, and (3) the test-expectancy and semantic-organization effects were additive. A standardizedz-score measure of category dependency in memory indicated that (1) people expecting recall were not more likely than those expecting recognition to form interitem associations between the related words and (2) recognition was category dependent, but less so than recall. Within the framework of Anderson and Bower’s (1972, 1974) theory, these data indicate that, compared with people expecting recognition, those expecting recall are not more likely to form interitem associations by tagging more pathways connecting semantically related nodes but, rather, are more likely to tag the nodes themselves. The implications that semantic-organization effects in recognition have for the Anderson-Bower theory were also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Miller, M. E., Maisto, S. A., Fleming, J. P., & Rosinsky, R. W.Storage processes for recall and recognition: The effect of instructions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin— Milwaukee, 1978.
Neely, J. H., Balota, D. A., & Schmidt, S. R.Test-expectancy effects in recall and recognition: A methodological empirical, and theoretical analysis. Manuscript in preparation, 1980.
Toglia, M. P., Barrett, T. R., & Crothers, E. J.Process differences in recall and recognition memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver, Colo., November 1975.
Neely, J. H., Schmidt, S. R., & Roediger, H. L., III.Output-interference and priming effects within categories in episodic recognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Mo., November 1980.
Leonard, J. M., & Whitten, W. B., II.Information stored while studying for recall or for recognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, Tex., November 1978.
References
Ambler, B., &Maples, W. Role of rehearsal in encoding and organization for free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 295–304.
Anderson, J. R. Fran: A simulation model of free recall. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 97–123.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1973.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. A propositional theory of recognition memory.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 406–412.
Balota, D. A., &Neely, J. H. Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 576–587.
Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 375–397.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969,80(3, Pt. 2).
Bower, G. H., Clark, M., Lesgold, A. M., &Winzenz, D. Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 323–343.
Brown, J. (Ed.).Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Bruce, D., &Fagan, R. L. More on the recognition and free recall of organized lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,85, 153–154.
Carey, S. T., &Lockhart, R. S. Encoding differences in recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 297–300.
Cohen, J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Connor, J. M. Effects of organization and expectancy on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 315–318.
Crowder, R. G.Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
D’agostino, P. R. The blocked-random effect in recall and recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 815–820.
Eagle, M., &Leiter, E. Recall and recognition in intentional and incidental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 58–63.
Glanzen, M., &Bowler, N. Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 21–31.
Glenberg, A., Smith, S. M., &Green, C. Type I rehearsal: Maintenance and more.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 339–352.
Griffith, D. Comparison of control processes for recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 223–228.
Hall, J. W., Grossman, L. R., &Elwood, K. D. Differences in encoding for free recall vs. recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 507–513.
Hall, J. W., Miskiewicz, R., &Murray, C. G. Effects of test expectancy (recall vs. recognition) on children’s recall and recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,10, 425–428.
Jacoby, L. L. Effects of organization on recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,92, 325–331.
Jacoby, L. L. Test appropriate strategies in retention of categorized lists.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 675–682.
Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hal, 1973.
Kinsbourne, M., &George, J. The mechanism of the word-frequency effect on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 63–69.
Kintsch, W. Recognition and free recall of organized lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,78, 481–487.
Kintsch, W. Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Landauer, T. K. Memory without organization: Properties of a model with random storage and undirected retrieval.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 495–531.
Light, L. L., &Carter-Sobell, L. Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 1–11.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., &Jacoby, L. Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Maisto, S. A., Dewaard, R. J., &Miller, M. E. Encoding processes for recall and recognition: The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,9, 127–130.
Maki, R. H., &Schuler, J. Effects of rehearsal duration and level of processing on memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 36–45.
Mandler, G. Organization and recognition. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Mandler, G. Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives in memory research. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Mandler, G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 252–271.
Mandler, G., Pearlstone, Z., &Koopmans, H. S. Effects of organization and semantic similarity on recall and recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 410–423.
Naus, M. J., Ornstein, P. A., &Kresvitool, K. Developmental differences in recall and recognition: The relationship between rehearsal and memory as test expectation changes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,23, 252–265.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 231–259.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Palermo, D. S., &Jenkins, J. J.Word association norms: Grade school through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1964.
Poltrock, S. E., &Macleod, C. M. Primacy and recency in the continuous distractor paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 560–571.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., &Bjork, R. A. A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 648–656.
Rundus, D. Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 63–77.
Slamecka, N. J. Intralist cueing of recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 630–637.
Todres, A. K., &Watkins, M. J. A part-set cuing effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981,7, 91–99.
Tulving, E. Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Wathins, O. C. Recognition failure of words with a single meaning.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 513–522.
Tversky, B. Encoding processes in recognition and recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 275–287.
Tversky, B. Eye fixations in prediction of recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 275–278.
Tzeng, O. J. L., Lee, A. T., &Wetzei, C. D. Temporal coding in verbal information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979,5, 52–64.
Wnek, I., &Read, J. D. Recall and recognition encoding differences for low- and high-imagery words.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980,50, 391–394.
Woodward, A. E., Bjork, R. A., &Jongeward, R. H. Recall and recognition as a function of primary rehearsal.Journal Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 608–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Because both authors contributed equally, the order of authorship counterbalances the randomly determined order of authorship on another article (Balota & Neely, 1980) to which the authors also made equal contributions. This research was conducted as D. A. Balota’s master’s thesis at the University of South Carolina under J. H. Neely’s supervision. Portions of this research were reported at the 1978 meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association in Atlanta.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neely, J.H., Balota, D.A. Test-expectancy and semantic-organization effects in recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition 9, 283–300 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196962
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196962