Abstract
The first part of the paper describes the limitations of the stepwise multiple-regression technique used by Gilhooly and Gilhooly (1979) to assess the roles of age of acquisition and other variables in memory. The high intercorrelations between the variables make the technique inappropriate for the identification of those variables that influence recall and recognition. An experiment in which age of acquisition and imagery were manipulated is then reported. Better free recall occurred for late-acquired words, and it is suggested that this resulted from their greater distinctiveness and saliency.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Whittle, A.The effect of the age of acquisition variable on free recall. Unpublished study, Lancaster University, 1978.
References
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 85–95.
Christian, J., Bickley, W., Tarka, M., &Clayton, K. Measures of free recall of 900 English nouns: Correlations with imagery, concreteness, meaningfulness, and frequency.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 379–390.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 214–233.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. The validity of age of acquisition ratings.British Journal of Psychology, 1980,71, 105–110.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Hay, D. Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1977,9, 12–17.
Gregg, V. Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Jones, S., &Winograd, E. Word imagery in recognition memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 632–634.
Morris, P. E. Frequency and imagery in word recognition: Further evidence for an attribute model.British Journal of Psychology, 1978,69, 69–75.
Morris, P. E., &Reid, R. J. Imagery and recognition.British Journal of Psychology, 1974,65, 7–12.
Noble, C. E. An analysis of meaning.Psychological Review, 1952,59, 421–430.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Paivio, A. Imagery in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Richardson, J. T. E. Imagery, concreteness and lexical complexity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 170–182.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.
Underwood, B. J., &Schulz, R. W.Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morr, P.E. Age of acquisition, imagery, recall, and the limitations of multiple-regression analysis. Memory & Cognition 9, 277–282 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196961
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196961