Abstract
Two hypotheses concerning the nature of lexical access, the exhaustive access and the terminating ordered search hypotheses, were examined in two separate studies using a crossmodal lexical priming task. In this task, subjects listened to sentences that were biased toward either the primary interpretation (a meaning occurring 75% or more of the time) or a secondary interpretation (a meaning occurring less than 25% of the time) of a lexical ambiguity that occurred in each sentence. Simultaneously, subjects made lexical decisions about visually presented words. Decisions to words related to both the primary and secondary meanings of the ambiguity were facilitated when presented immediately following occurrence of the ambiguity in the sentence. This effect held under each of the two biasing context conditions. However, when they were presented 1.5 sec following occurrence of the ambiguity, only visual words related to the contextually relevant meaning of the ambiguity were facilitated. These results support the exhaustive access hypothesis. It is argued that lexical access is an autonomous subsystem of the sentence comprehension routine in which all meanings of a word are momentarily accessed, regardless of the factors of contextual bias or bias associated with frequency of use.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Cutler, A., & Foss, D. J.Comprehension of ambiguous sentences. The locus of context effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May 1974.
Hogaboam, T.Lexical ambiguity and sentence processing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, 1977.
Hogaboam, T.Comprehension times for ambiguous words in natural language contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of th.e Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, Tex., November 1978.
References
Cairns, H. S., &Hsu, J. R. Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension: A replication and reinterpretation.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1980,9, 1–8.
Cairns, H. S., &Kamerman, J. Lexical information processing during sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbaIBehavior, 1975,14, 170–179.
Chodorow, M. Time compressed speech and the study of lexical and syntactic processing. In W. Cooper, & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Conrad, C. Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 130–138.
Cutler, A., &Norris, D. Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Forster, K. I. Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New Approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976.
Forster, K. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds.),Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistics studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Foss, D. J. Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 699–706.
Foss, D. J., &Jenkins, C. Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 577–589.
Foss, D. J., &Swinney, D. On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification and consciousness.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 246–257.
Garrett, M. Does ambiguity complicate the perception of sentences? In G. B. D’Arcais & W. J. Levelt (Eds.),Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970.
Hogaboam, T., &Pereetti, C. Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 265–274.
Holley-Wilcox, P., &Blank, M. Evidence for multiple access in the processing of isolated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 75–84.
Holmes, V. M. Accessing ambiguous words during sentence comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1979,44, 13–35.
Holmes, V. M., Arwas, R., &Garrett, M. F. Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 103–110.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design. Monterey, Calif: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W.Computational Analysis of presentday American English, Providence, R. l: Brown University Press, 1967.
Lackner, J. R., &Garrent, M. F. Resolving ambiguity: Effects of biasing context in the unattended ear.Cognition, 1972,1, 359–372.
Mehler, J., Segui, J., &Carey, P. Tails of words: Monitoring ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 29–35.
Newman, J. E., &Dell, G. S. The phonological nature of phoneme monitoring: A critique of some ambiguity studies.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 359–374.
ONifer, W., Hirshkowitz, M., &Swinney, D. A miniprocessor PDP8/e-based system for investigations of on-line language processing: Automated program for psycholinguistic experiments (APPLE).Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1978,10, 307–308.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 1979,84, 127–190.
Simpson, G. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 120–136.
Swinney, D. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 645–660.
Swinney, D. Lexical processing during sentence comprehension: Effects of higher order constraints and implications for representation. In T. Myers, J. Laver, & J. Anderson (Eds.),The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North Holland, in press.
Swinney, D., Onifer, W., Prather, P., &Hirshkowitz, M. Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 159–165.
Tunenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., &Seidenberg, M. S. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words on syntactic contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 427–440.
Tweedy, J., Lapinski, R. H., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. Semantic context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 84–89.
Yates, J. Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 636–643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authorship of this paper was a joint and equal undertaking, and the order of authors is given alphabetically.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onifer, W., Swinney, D.A. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition 9, 225–236 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196957
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196957