Abstract
The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) allows for the statistical separation of different components of a speeded binary decision process (decision threshold, bias, information uptake, and motor response). These components are represented by different parameters of the model. Two experiments were conducted to test the interpretational validity of the parameters. Using a color discrimination task, we investigated whether experimental manipulations of specific aspects of the decision process had specific effects on the corresponding parameters in a diffusion model data analysis (see Ratcliff, 2002; Ratcliff & Rouder, 1998; Ratcliff, Thapar, & McKoon, 2001, 2003). In support of the model, we found that (1) decision thresholds were higher when we induced accuracy motivation, (2) drift rates (i.e., information uptake) were lower when stimuli were harder to discriminate, (3) the motor components were increased when a more difficult form of response was required, and (4) the process was biased towardrewarded responses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., &Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 760–773.
Conover, W. J. (1999).Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Feller, W. (1971).An introduction to probability theory and its applications. (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
Kolmogorov, A. (1941). Confidence limits for an unknown distribution function.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,12, 461–463.
Miller, L. H. (1956). Table of percentage points of Kolmogorov statistics.Journal of the American Statistical Association,51, 111–121.
Nelder, J. A., &Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization.Computer Journal,7, 308–313.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling accumulation of partial information.Psychological Review,95, 238–255.
Ratcliff, R. (2001). Diffusion and random walk processes. InInternational encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3668–3673). Oxford: Elsevier.
Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 278–291.
Ratcliff, R., &Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions.Psychological Science,9, 347–356.
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., &McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 1–25.
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., &McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task.Psychology & Aging,16, 323–341.
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., &McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 523–535.
Ratcliff, R., &Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 438–481.
Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., &McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.Psychological Review,106, 261–300.
Rothermund, K., &Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie,48, 94–106.
Schall, J. D. (2001). Neural basis of deciding, choosing, and acting.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 33–42.
Wentura, D. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,26, 456–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voss, A., Rothermund, K. & Voss, J. Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition 32, 1206–1220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196893
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196893