The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the use of verbal protocols as data in the study of the cognitive processes underlying insight. Fifty-eight Temple University undergraduates attempted to solve Duncker’s (1945) candle problem either silently or while thinking aloud. Solution rates, solving times, and solution types were comparable between conditions, suggesting thatverbal overshadowing (Schooler, Ohlsson, & Brooks, 1993) did not occur when the participants attempted to solve the candle problem. Subsequent analysis of verbal protocols provided a catalogue of solutions generated by the participants, as well as empirical support for the occurrence of impasse and restructuring. Although restructuring was present in the majority of protocols, including those of the participants who later produced the box solution, the presence of impasse occurred with less frequency and was not associated with production of the box solution. These results provide information concerning how the candle problem is solved and suggest that verbalization can be used to examine how individuals solve insight problems and to evaluate existing theories of insight.

References

  1. Adamson, R. E. (1952). Functional fixedness as related to problem solving: A repetition of three experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 288–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein, D. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., Penner, L. A., Roy, E. J., &Wickens, C. D. (2000).Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brandimonte, M. A., Schooler, J. W., &Gabbino, P. (1997). Attenuation verbal overshadowing through color retrieval cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulbrook, M. E. (1932). An experimental inquiry into the existence and nature of “insight.”American Journal of Psychology,44, 409–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving.Psychological Monographs,58(5, Whole No. 270).

  6. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: Interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 981–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, H. A. (1993).Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fallshore, M., &Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1608–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flaherty, E. G. (1974). The thinking aloud technique and problem solving ability.Journal of Educational Research,68, 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner, M. (1978).Aha! Aha! insight. New York: Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glucksberg, S., &Weisberg, R. W. (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of labeling in a functional fixedness problem.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 659–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan, C. A., &Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight.Cognitive Psychology,22, 374–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karat, J. (1983).Modeling learning and transfer in a problem solving task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.

  14. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., &Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1534–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., &Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving.Memory & Cognition,29, 1000–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Köhler, W. (1959).The mentality of apes. New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1925)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Köhler, W. (1969).The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lavric, A., Forstmeier, S., &Rippon, G. (2000). Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks: An ERP study.NeuroReport,11, 1613–1618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung.Psychological Monographs,54(6, Whole No. 248).

  20. Lung, C. T., &Dominowski, R. L. (1985). Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 804–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McNemar, Q. (1962).Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., &Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing.Memory & Cognition,29, 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Melcher, J. M., &Schooler, J. W. (1996). The misremembrance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Metcalfe, J., &Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving.Memory & Cognition,15, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Newell, A., &Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,25, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.),Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 1–44). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., &Chronicle, E. P. (2002). Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 791–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perkins, D. (1981).The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scheerer, M. (1963). Problem solving.Scientific American,208, 118–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schooler, J. W., &Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid.Cognitive Psychology,22, 36–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., &Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sternberg, R. J., &Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler.Psychology Today,16, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sternberg, R. J., &Davidson, J. E. (1995).The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weisberg, R. W. (1980).Memory, thought, and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weisberg, R. W. (1993).Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: A taxonomy of problems. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 157–196). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weisberg, R. W., &Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Weisberg, R. W., &Suls, J. (1973). An information-processing model of Duncker’s candle problem.Cognitive Psychology,4, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wertheimer, M. (1961).Productive thinking (rev. ed.). London: Tavistock. (Original work published 1945)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Westen, D. (1999).Psychology: Mind, brain, and culture (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica I. Fleck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleck, J.I., Weisberg, R.W. The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory & Cognition 32, 990–1006 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196876

Download citation

Keywords

  • Solution Rate
  • Verbal Protocol
  • Training Problem
  • Insight Problem
  • Constraint Relaxation