Attention and the subjective expansion of time

Abstract

During brief, dangerous events, such as car accidents and robberies, many people report that events seem to pass in slow motion, as if time had slowed down. We have measured a similar, although less dramatic, effect in response to unexpected, nonthreatening events. We attribute the subjective expansion of time to the engagement of attention and its influence on the amount of perceptual information processed. We term the effecttime’s subjective expansion (TSE) and examine here the objective temporal dynamics of these distortions. When a series of stimuli are shown in succession, the lowprobabilityoddball stimulus in the series tends to last subjectively longer than the high-probability stimulus even when they last the same objective duration. In particular, (1) there is a latency of at least 120 msec between stimulus onset and the onset of TSE, which may be preceded by subjective temporal contraction; (2) there is a peak in TSE at which subjective time is particularly distorted at a latency of 225 msec after stimulus onset; and (3) the temporal dynamics of TSE are approximately the same in the visual and the auditory domains. Two control experiments (in which the methods of magnitude estimation and stimulus reproduction were used) replicated the temporal dynamics of TSE revealed by the method of constant stimuli, although the initial peak was not apparent with these methods. In addition, a third, control experiment (in which the method of single stimuli was used) showed that TSE in the visual domain can occur because of semantic novelty, rather than image novelty per se. Overall, the results support the view that attentional orienting underlies distortions in perceived duration.

References

  1. Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allan, L. G. (1984). Contingent aftereffects in duration judgments. In J. Gibbon & L. G. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 116–130). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allan, L. G., &Gibbon, J. (1994). A new temporal illusion or the TOE once again?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., &Antes, J. R. (1975). Effects of stimulus familiarity on judged visual duration.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baylis, G., &Driver, J. (1995). One-sided edge assignment in vision: 1. Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects.Current Directions in Psychological Science,4, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantor, N. E., &Thomas, E. A. (1977). Control of attention in the processing of temporal and spatial information in complex visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,34, 582–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fechner, G. T. (1860).Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fechner, G. T. (1882).Revision der Hauptpunkte der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Festinger, L., Coren, S., &Rivers, G. (1970). The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation.American Journal of Psychology,2, 126–150.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fraisse, P. (1963).The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frankenhauser, M. (1959).Estimation of time. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Larrea, L., Lukaszewicz, A.-C., &Mauguiere, F. (1992). Revisiting the oddball paradigm: Non-target vs. neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects.Neuropsychologia,30, 723–741.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grondin, S., &Macar, F. (1992). Dividing attention between temporal and nontemporal tasks: A performance operating characteristic— POC—analysis. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 119–128). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hellström, Å. (1977). Time errors are perceptual.Psychological Research,39, 345–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hellström, Å. (1979). Time errors and differential sensation weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin,97, 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data.American Journal of Psychology,60, 1–29.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hicks, R. E., &Brundige, R. M. (1974). Judgments of temporal duration while processing verbal and physiognomic stimuli.Acta Psychologica,38, 447–453.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., &Bierman, K. (1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing.American Journal of Psychology,90, 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., &Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.American Journal of Psychology,89, 719–730.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.Vision Research,33, 1219–1240.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hollingworth, H. L. (1910). The central tendency of judgment.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, & Scientific Methods,7, 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hülser, C. (1924). Zeitauffassung und Zeitschätzung verschieden ausgefüllter Intervalle unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Aufmerksamkeitsablenkung.Archiv der Gesamten Psychologie,49, 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons.Vision Research,40, 1443–1458.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Pairing effects and time-order errors in duration discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Katz, D. (1906). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichs im Gebiete des Zeitsinns [Experimental contributions to the psychology of our sense of time].Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Physiologie der Sinnesorgane,42, 302–340.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leuba, A. (1892). A new instrument for Weber’s law; with indications of a law of sense memory.American Journal of Psychology,5, 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Macar, F., Grondin, S., &Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation.Memory & Cognition,22, 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mackeben, M., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Express attentional shifts.Vision Research,33, 85–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (1998). Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1305–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., &Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Michon, J. A. (1978). The making of the present: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 89–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nakajima, Y., ten Hoopen, G., Hilkhuysen, G., &Sasaki, T. (1992). Time-shrinking: A discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 504–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakajima, Y., ten Hoopen, G., &van der Wilk, R. G. H. (1991). A new illusion of time perception.Music Perception,8, 431–448.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ornstein, R. E. (1969).On the experience of time. Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Petrusic, W. M. (1984). Explicit counting and time-order errors in duration discrimination. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 630–633). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Polich, J. (1986). Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,63, 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Potts, G. F., Liotti, M., Tucker, D. M., &Posner, M. I. (1996). Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: Evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials.Brain Topography,9, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pratt, C. C. (1933). Time-errors in the method of single stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 798–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Predebon, J. (1996). The relationship between the number of presented stimuli and prospective duration estimates: The effect of concurrent task activity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 376–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quasebarth, K. (1924). Zeitschätzung und Zeitauffassung optisch und akustisch ausgefüllter Intervalle.Archiv der Gesamten Psychologie,49, 379–432.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping.Psychological Review,102, 101–130.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rose, D., &Summers, J. (1995). Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli.Perception,24, 1177–1187.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schab, F. R., &Crowder, R. G. (1988). The role of succession in temporal cognition: Is the time-order error a recency effect of memory?Perception & Psychophysics,44, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schiffman, H. R., &Bobko, D. J. (1974). Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 156–159.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shiu, L.-P., &Pashler, H. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity.Vision Research,35, 337–343.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stelmach, L. B., Herdman, C. M., &McNeil, K. R. (1994). Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Thomas, E. A. C., &Brown, T. I., Jr. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Thomas, E. A. C., &Cantor, N. E. (1978). Interdependence between the processing of temporal and non-temporal information. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 43–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Thomas, E. A. C., &Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”.Psychological Monographs,77, 1–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tse, P. U., Sheinberg, D. L., &Logothetis, N. K. (2003). Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness.Psychological Science,14, 91–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Underwood, G., &Swain, R. A. (1973). Selectivity of attention and the perception of duration.Perception,2, 101–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Vierordt, K. von (1868).Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. Tübingen: Laupp.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weinberg, L. (1991–1995).Poser [Computer software]. Fractal Design Corp.

  68. Woodrow, H. (1930). The reproduction of temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1224–1236). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zakay, D. (1993). Time estimation methods: Do they influence prospective duration estimates?Perception,22, 91–101.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zakay, D., &Tsal, Y. (1989). Awareness of attention allocation and time estimation accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 209–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ulric Tse.

Additional information

This research was supported by McDonnell-Pew Grant 98-49CNS and NIH Grant R03 MH0609660-01 to P.U.T., by the Max Planck Society, AASERT Grant F49620-94-1-0376 to P.C., and by NSERC Grant 015593 to J.R.

Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, headed by Neil Macmillan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tse, P.U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J. et al. Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1171–1189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196844

Download citation

Keywords

  • Magnitude Estimation
  • Time Perception
  • Constant Stimulus
  • Oddball Paradigm
  • Duration Judgment