Abstract
The controlled attention theory of working memory suggests that individuals with greater working memory capacity (WMC) are better able to control or focus their attention than individuals with lesser WMC. This relationship has been observed in a number of selective attention paradigms including a dichotic listening task (Conway, Cowan, & Bunting, 2001) in which participants were required to shadow words presented to one ear and ignore words presented to the other ear. Conway et al. found that when the participant’s name was presented to the ignored ear, 65% of participants with low WMC reported hearing their name, compared to only 20% of participants with high WMC, suggesting greater selective attention on the part of high WMC participants. In the present study, individual differences in divided attention were examined in a dichotic listening task, in which participants shadowed one message and listened for their own name in the other message. Here we find that 66.7% of high WMC and 34.5% of low WMC participants detected their name. These results suggest that as WMC capacity increases, so does the ability to control the focus of attention, with high WMC participants being able to flexibly “zoom in” or “zoom out” depending on task demands.
Article PDF
References
Baddeley, A., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Bleckley, M. K., Durso, F. T., Crutchfield, J. M., Engle, R. W., &Khanna, M. M. (2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 884–889.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., &Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 331–335.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., &Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 769–786.
Cowan, N. (2005). Understanding intelligence: A summary and an adjustable-attention hypothesis. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.),Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 469–488). London: Sage.
Engle, R. W., &Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity: Individual differences in memory span and the control of visual orienting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 637–671.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 189–217.
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,11, 56–60.
Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1302–1321.
Wood, N., &Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 255–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was submitted to the University of Illinois at Chicago in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree by G.J.H.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colflesh, G.J.H., Conway, A.R.A. Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 699–703 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196824
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196824