Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 606–611 | Cite as

The effects of frontal lobe functioning and age on veridical and false recall

  • Jason C. K. ChanEmail author
  • Kathleen B. McDermott
Brief Reports


Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Older adults’ heightened susceptibility to false memories has been linked to compromised frontal lobe functioning as estimated by Glisky and colleagues’ (Glisky, Polster, & Routhieaux, 1995) neuropsychological battery (e.g., Butler, McDaniel, Dornburg, Price, & Roediger, 2004). This conclusion, however, rests on the untested assumption that young adults have uniformly high frontal functioning. We tested this assumption, and we correlated younger and older adults’ frontal scores with veridical and false recall probabilities with prose materials. Substantial variability in scores on the Glisky battery occurred for younger (and older) adults. However, frontal scores and age were independent contributors to recall probabilities. Frontal functioning is not the sole cause of older adults’ heightened susceptibility to false memories.


Frontal Lobe Work Memory Capacity False Memory Source Memory False Recall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, N. D., &Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Memory in the aging brain. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 411–425). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brewer, W. F. (1977). Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences.Memory & Cognition,5, 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryan, J., &Luszcz, M. A. (1996). Speed of information processing as a mediator between age and free-recall performance.Psychology & Aging,11, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckner, R. L. (2004). Memory and executive function in aging and AD: multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate.Neuron,44, 195–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, K. M., McDaniel, M. A., Dornburg, C. C., Price, A. L., &Roediger, H. L., III (2004). Age differences in veridical and false recall are not inevitable: The role of frontal lobe function.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 921–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabeza, R., Anderson, N. D., Locantore, J. K., &McIntosh, A. R. (2002). Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults.NeuroImage,17, 1394–1402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabeza, R., &Nyberg, L. (2000). Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence.Current Opinion in Neurology,13, 415–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, J. C. K., &McDermott, K. B. (2006). Remembering pragmatic inference.Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, P., &Glisky, E. L. (2002). Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,2, 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dywan, J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame.Psychology & Aging,5, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glisky, E. L., Polster, M. R., &Routhieaux, B. (1995). Double dissociation between item and source memory.Neuropsychology,9, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, R. P., Kwentus, J. A., Wade, J. B., &Taylor, J. R. (1988). Modified Wisconsin Sorting test in elderly normal, depressed and demented patients.Clinical Neuropsychologist,2, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., &De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source memory: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoshi, Y., Oda, I., Wada, Y., Ito, Y., Yamashita, Y., Oda, M., et al. (2000). Visuospatial imagery is a fruitful strategy for the digit span backward task: A study with near-infrared optical tomography.Cognitive Brain Research,9, 339–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic and intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaschinski, U., &Wentura, D. (2002). Misleading postevent information and working memory capacity: An individual differences approach to eyewitness memory.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., &Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kausler, D. H. (1994).Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Logan, J. M., Sanders, A. L., Snyder, A. Z., Morris, J. C., &Buckner, R. L. (2002). Under-recruitment and nonselective recruitment: Dissociable neural mechanisms associated with aging.Neuron,33, 827–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovden, M. (2003). The episodic memory and inhibition accounts of age-related increases in false memories: A consistency check.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDermott, K. B., &Chan, J. C. K. (2006). Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences.Memory & Cognition,34, 1273–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Multhaup, K. S., De Leonardis, D. M., &Johnson, H. M. (1999). Source memory and eyewitness suggestibility in older adults.Journal of General Psychology,126, 74–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raz, N. (2000). Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: Integration of structural and functional findings. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.),The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Rhodes, M. G., &Kelley, C. M. (2005). Executive processes, memory accuracy, and memory monitoring: An aging and individual difference analysis.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 578–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roediger, H. L., III, &Geraci, L. (2007). Aging and the misinformation effect: A neuropsychological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,33, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false mem ories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, A. B., Taylor, E., Brammer, M., &Rubia, K. (2004). Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.Human Brain Mapping,21, 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spreen, O., &Benton, A. L. (1977).Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
  31. Velanova, K., Jacoby, L. L., Wheeler, M. E., McAvoy, M. P., Petersen, S. E., &Buckner, R. L. (2003). Functional-anatomic correlates of sustained and transient processing components engaged during controlled retrieval.Journal of Neuroscience,23, 8460–8470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Warburton, E. A., Wise, R. J. S., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S., et al. (1996). Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects: Studies with PET.Brain,119, 159–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Poole, B. J., &Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wechsler, D. (1981).Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised manual. New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  35. Wechsler, D. (1997).Wechsler Memory Scale-III manual. New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  36. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging.Psychological Bulletin,120, 272–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zachary, R. (1986).Shipley Institute of Living Scale-Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations