Causal judgment is assumed to play a central role in prediction, control, and explanation. Here, we consider the function or functions that map contingency information concerning the relationship between a single cue and a single outcome onto causal judgments. We evaluate normative accounts of causal induction and report the findings of an extensive meta-analysis in which we used a cross-validation model-fitting method and carried out a qualitative analysis of experimental trends in order to compare a number of alternative models. The best model to emerge from this competition is one in which judgments are based on the difference between the amount of confirming and disconfirming evidence. A rational justification for the use of this model is proposed.
Aitken, M. R. F., Larkin, M. J. W., &Dickinson, A. (2000). Superlearning of causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53B, 59–81.
Aitken, M. R. F., Larkin, M. J. W., &Dickinson, A. (2001). Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54B, 27–51.
Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?Psychological Bulletin,114, 435–448.
Allan, L. G. (2003). Assessing power PC.Learning & Behavior,31, 192–204.
Allan, L. G., &Jenkins, H. M. (1983). The effect of representations of binary variables on judgment of influence.Learning & Motivation,14, 381–405.
Anderson, J. R. (1990).The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., &Sheu, C.-F, (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments.Memory & Cognition,23, 510–524.
Baker, A. G., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., &Murphy, R. A. (2000). Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm.Memory & Cognition,28, 466–479.
Buehner, M. J., &Cheng, P. W. (1997). Causal induction: The power PC theory versus the RW model. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.),Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 55–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Buehner, M. J., Cheng, P. W., &Clifford, D. (2003). From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1119–1140.
Buehner, M. J., &May, J. (2003). Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 865–890.
Busemeyer, J. R. (1991). Intuitive statistical estimation. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory (pp. 187–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Catena, A., Maldonado, A., &Cándido, A. (1998). The effect of frequency of judgement and the type of trials on covariation learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 481–495.
Chapman, G. B., &Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.Memory & Cognition,18, 537–545.
Cheng, P. W. (1993). Separating causal laws from causal facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 215–264). San Diego: Academic Press.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review,104, 367–405.
Cheng, P. W. (2000). Causality in the mind: Estimating contextual and conjunctive power. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.),Explanation and cognition (pp. 227–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitblat & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.),Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheng, P. W., &Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction.Psychological Review,99, 365–382.
Collins, D. J., &Shanks, D. R. (2006). Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on type of probe question.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 225–232.
Danks, D. J. (2002). The epistemology of causal judgment.Dissertation Abstracts International,63, 212.
De Houwer, J., &Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55B, 289–310.
Dickinson, A., &Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 60–80.
Glautier, S. (2002). Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55B, 121–135.
Glymour, C. (1998). Learning causes: Psychological explanations of causal explanation.Mind & Machines,8, 39–60.
Glymour, C. (2001).The mind’s arrows: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Glymour, C., Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., &Kelly, K. (1987).Discovering causal structure: Artificial intelligence, philosophy of science, and statistical modeling. San Diego: Academic Press.
Griffiths, T. L., &Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction.Cognitive Psychology,51, 334–384.
Inhelder, B., &Piaget, J. (1958).The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. Oxford: Basic Books.
Lagnado, D., &Sloman, S. A. (2004). The advantage of timely intervention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 856–876.
Levin, I. P., Wasserman, E. A., &Kao, S.-F. (1993). Multiple methods for examining biased information use in contingency judgments.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,55, 228–250.
Lober, K., &Shanks, D. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997).Psychological Review,107, 195–212.
Lovibond, P. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 97–106.
Maldonado, A., Jiménez, G., Herrera, A., Perales, J. C., &Catena, A. (2006). Inattentional blindness for negative relationships in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 457–470.
Mandel, D. R., &Lehman, D. R. (1998). Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation, and probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 269–285.
Myung, I. J., Foster, M. R., & Browne, M. W. (Eds.) (2000). Special issue on model selection.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,44, 1–231.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review,94, 61–73.
Pearl, J. (1988).Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Pearl, J. (2000).Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perales, J. C., &Catena, A. (2006). Human causal induction: A glimpse at the whole picture.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,18, 277–320.
Perales, J. C., Catena, A., &Maldonado, A. (2004). Inferring non-observed correlations from causal scenarios: The role of causal knowledge.Learning & Motivation,35, 115–135.
Perales, J. C., Catena, A.,Shanks, D. R., &González, J. A. (2005). Dissociation between judgments and outcome-expectancy measures in covariation learning: A signal detection theory approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 1105–1120.
Perales, J. C., &Shanks, D. R. (2003). Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 977–1007.
Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2004, May).The cause-density effect as a tool to discriminate between causal learning models. Paper presented at the Special Interest Meeting on Human Contingency Learning, Lignely, Belgium.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations of the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Schustack, M. W., &Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Evaluation of evidence in causal inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 101–120.
Shanks, D. R. (1995).The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shanks, D. R. (2002). Tests of the power PC theory of causal induction with negative contingencies.Experimental Psychology,49, 81–88.
Shanks, D. R., &Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 21. Advances in research and theory (pp. 229–261). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K., &Medin, D. L. (Eds.) (1996).The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning. San Diego: Academic Press.
Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., &Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality by human subjects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 139–159.
Sloman, S. A. (2005).Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sloman, S. A., &Lagnado, D. (2004). Causal invariance in reasoning and learning. In B. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 44. Advances in research and theory (pp. 207–325). San Diego: Academic Press.
Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,4, 165–173.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., &Scheines, R. (1998).Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E.-J., &Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions.Cognitive Science,27, 453–489.
Tenenbaum, J. B., &Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Structure learning in human causal induction. In T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich, & V. Tresp (Eds.),Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 13, pp. 59–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Murphy, R. A., Drew, S., &Baker, A. G. (1998). Judging the importance of constant and variable candidate causes: A test of the power PC theory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 65–84.
Van-Hamme, L. J., &Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements.Learning & Motivation,25, 127–151.
Waldmann, M. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 53–76.
Waldmann, M. R., &Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort.Cognition,82, 27–58.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 222–236.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: Comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996).Memory & Cognition,25, 125–134.
Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: Toward a general understanding of cognition in behavior.Psychological Science,4, 156–161.
Wasserman, E. A., Kao, S.-F., Van-Hamme, L. J., Katagiri, M., &Young, M. E. (1996). Causation and association. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak, & D. L. Medin (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning (pp. 207–264). San Diego: Academic Press.
White, P. A. (2003a). Causal judgement as evaluation of evidence: The use of confirmatory and disconfirmatory information.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 491–513.
White, P. A. (2003b). Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment.Memory & Cognition,31, 231–242.
White, P. A. (2003c). Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: The pCI rule.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 710–727.
White, P. A. (2004). Causal judgment from contingency information: A systematic test of the pCI rule.Memory & Cognition,32, 353–368.
White, P. A. (2005a). Cue interaction effects in causal judgment: An interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58B, 99–140.
White, P. A. (2005b). Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 999–1021.
About this article
Cite this article
Perales, J.C., Shanks, D.R. Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 577–596 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196807
- Causal Structure
- Associative Strength
- Causal Power
- Causal Judgment
- Causal Belief