Skip to main content

Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide

Abstract

Working memory (WM) span tasks—and in particular, counting span, operation span, and reading span tasks—are widely used measures of WM capacity. Despite their popularity, however, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of the merits of WM span tasks as measurement tools. Here, we review the genesis of these tasks and discuss how and why they came to be so influential. In so doing, we address the reliability and validity of the tasks, and we consider more technical aspects of the tasks, such as optimal administration and scoring procedures. Finally, we discuss statistical and methodological techniques that have commonly been used in conjunction with WM span tasks, such as latent variable analysis and extreme-groups designs.

References

  • Anderson, J. R., &Lebiere, C. (1998).The atomic components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. S. (1960). Poststimulus cuing in immediate memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 216–221.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, P. A., Higginson, C. H., Voss, W. D., Bender, W. I., Wurst, J. M., &Tippin, J. M. (1999). Depression in multiple sclerosis: Relationship to working memory capacity.Neuropsychology,13, 546–556.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.Psychological Bulletin,130, 553–573.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrouillet, P. (1996). Transitive inferences from set-inclusion relations and working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1408–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A., &Plake, B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences among writers.Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 820–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleckley, M. K., Durso, F. T., Crutchfield, J. M., Engle, R. W., &Khanna, M. M. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 884–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R., &Beaton, A. (2002). Thought suppression, intelligence, and working memory capacity.Behaviour Research & Therapy,40, 923–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, M. F. (in press). Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.

  • Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual-differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Kurland, M. D., &Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,33, 386–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson-Smith, L., &Hartley, A. A. (1990). The game of bridge as an exercise in working memory and reasoning.Journal of Gerontology,45, P233-P238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization.Applied Psychological Measurement,3, 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., &Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence.Intelligence,30, 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory.Memory,4, 577–590.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., &Kane, M. J. (2001). Capacity, control and conflict: An individual differences perspective on attentional capture. In C. Folk & B. Gibson (Eds.),Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attention capture (pp. 349–372). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 547–552.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, D. E., &Radvansky, G. A. (2001). Phonological similarity in working memory.Memory & Cognition,29, 774–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Towse, J. N., Hamilton, Z., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., Lacey, J. F., et al. (2003). Children’s working-memory processes: A response-timing analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.),Human memory and cognitive Capabilities (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, A. R., &Rule, B. G. (1989). Adult age differences in working memory.Psychology & Aging,4, 500–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, M. R. P., &Hunter, J. (2003). Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval.Memory & Cognition,31, 968–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1897). Über eine neue Methode zur Prü fung geistiger Fähigkeiten und ihre Anwendung bei Schulkindern On a new method of testing mental abilities and its application with school children].Zeitschrift für die Psychologie,13, 401–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder(pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention.Current Directions in Psychological Science,11, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., &Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 972–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Carullo, J. J., &Collins, K. W. (1991). Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions.Journal of Educational Research,84, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah(Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, P. R. (2002). Motivation, working memory, and decision making: A cognitive-motivational theory of personality vulnerability to alcoholism.Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews,1, 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., &Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 136–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. Z., &Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis.Cognitive Psychology,44, 339–384.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2004).Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Hitch, G. J., Towse, J. N., &Hutton, U. (2001). What limits children’s working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, U. M. Z., &Towse, J. N. (2001). Short-term memory and working memory as indices of children’s cognitive skills.Memory,9, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 637–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A., &Benton, S. L. (1988). The relationship between information processing ability and notetaking.Contemporary Educational Psychology,13, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J., &Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 580–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 352–358.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., &Boals, A. (2001). The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 565–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., &Fiss, W. H. (1999). The reliability and stability of the Turner and Engle working memory task.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 429–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998).Principles and practice of structural equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman’s g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.),Human abilities: Their nature and Measurement (pp. 49–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., &Stephens, D. L. (1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill.Learning & Individual Differences,2, 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehto, J. (1996). Are executive function tests dependent on working memory capacity?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, C., May, C. P., &Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C., Almor, A., Henderson, V. W., Kempler, D., &Andersen, E. S. (2001). Assessing working memory and language comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain & Language,78, 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, J. F. (1959). Paced memorizing in a continuous task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 206–211.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. P., Hasher, L., &Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span.Memory & Cognition,27, 759–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., &Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. E., &Ross, B. M. (1963). Context effects in running memory.Psychological Reports,12, 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N., &Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive.British Journal of Psychology,81, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munakata, Y., Morton, B., & O’Reilly, R. C. O. (in press). Developmental and computational approaches to variation in working memory. In A. R. A. Conway, gnC. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.),Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nairne, J. S. (2002) Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., &Süß, H.-M. (2000).Working memory and interference: A comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 727–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., &Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity: Facets of a cognitive ability construct.Personality & Individual Differences,29, 1017–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., &Wittmann, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination.Intelligence,31, 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, I., Johnson, L. B., &Knaff, P. R. (1959). Running memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology,57, 137–146.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richeson, J. A., Baird, A. A., Gordon, H. L., Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., Trawalter, S., et al.(2003). An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function.Nature Neuroscience,6, 1323–1328.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richeson, J. A., &Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function.Psychological Science,14, 287–291.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, V. M., Bergeson, J. L., Putnam, K., Harwell, A., &Sunderland, T. (2002). Working memory and apolipoprotein E: What’s the connection?Neuropsychologia,40, 2226–2233.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1995). Differential age-related influences on memory for verbal-symbolic and visual-spatial information?Journal of Gerontology,50B, P193-P201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L., &Shaw, R. J. (1991). Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory.Psychology & Aging,6, 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., &Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,85, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P., &Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured.American Journal of Psychology,15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., &Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning Ability—and a little bit more.Intelligence,30, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, J. N., &Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (1998). A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (2002). On the nature of the relationship between processing activity and item retention in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,82, 156–184.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turley-Ames, K. J., &Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 446–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction.American Psychologist,30, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., &Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity in hot and cold cognition. In R. W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. Hecker, & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.),Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology (pp. 19–43). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1302–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., &Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A,51–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, N. (1960). Serial position and the memory-span.American Journal of Psychology,73, 68–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yntema, D. B., &Mueser, G. E. (1960). Remembering the present states of a number of variables.Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 18–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yntema, D. B., &Mueser, G. E. (1962). Keeping track of variables that have few or many states.Journal of Experimental Psychology,63, 391–395.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew R. A. Conway.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F. et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 769–786 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772

Keywords

  • Work Memory
  • Work Memory Capacity
  • Stereotype Threat
  • Span Task
  • Work Memory Span