Abstract
The literature on intuitive physics shows that many people exhibit systematic errors when predicting the behavior of simple physical events. Most previous research has attributed these errors to factors specific to a certain class of tasks. In the present study, we investigated the possibility that intuitive physics performance may be related to general measures of cognitive ability. Two hundred four adults (ages, 20-91 years) were presented with five pairs of intuitive physics questions. It was found that performance on the intuitive physics items was moderately intercorrelated, suggesting that they were tapping into a unitary construct. Despite the correlation with factors that decline with advancing age, intuitive physics performance was not correlated with age (r= .00). The findings are discussed in the context of research on intuitive physics, as well as research on cognitive aging.
Article PDF
References
Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M., &Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects.Cognition,9, 117–123.
Cooke, N. J., &Breedin, S. D. (1994). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly.Memory & Cognition,22, 474–493.
Horn, J. L., &Cattell, R. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence.Acta Psychologica,26, 107–129.
Kaiser, M. K., Jonides, J., &Alexander, J. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems.Memory & Cognition,14, 308–312.
Kaiser, M. K., McCloskey, M., &Proffitt, D. R. (1986). Development of intuitive theories of motion: Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces.Developmental Psychology,22, 67–71.
Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., &McCloskey, M. (1985). The development of beliefs about falling objects.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 533–539.
Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., Whelan, S. M., &Hecht, H. (1992). Influence of animation on dynamical judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 669–690.
Kozhevnikov, M., &Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 439–453.
Liben, L. S. (1991). The Piagetian water-level task: Looking beneath the surface. In R. Vasta (Ed.),Annals of child development (Vol. 8, pp. 81–143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
McAfee, E. A., &Proffitt, D. R. (1991). Understanding the surface orientation of liquids.Cognitive Psychology,23, 483–514.
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., &Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects.Science,210, 1139–1141.
McCloskey, M., &Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 146–156.
McGrew, K. S., &Flanagan, D. P. (1998).The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Piaget, J., &Inhelder, B. (1963). Intellectual operations and their development.Traite de Psychologie Experimentale,7, 111–155.
Proffitt, D. R., &Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 384–393.
Robert, M. (1990). Sex-typing of the water-level task: There is more than meets the eye.International Journal of Psychology,25, 475–490.
Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging.Current Directions in Psychological Science,13, 140–144.
Salthouse, T. A., &Ferrer-Caja, E. (2003). What needs to be explained to account for age-related effects on multiple cognitive variables?Psychology & Aging,18, 91–110.
Shanon, B. (1976). Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the physics of the layman.Perception,5, 241–243.
Wechsler, D. (1997).Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Woodcock, W. R., &Johnson, M. B. (1990).Woodcock-Johnson PsychoEducational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF ITR/Carnegie Mellon Grant 0121629 and ONR Grant N000140110060 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riener, C., Proffitt, D.R. & Salthouse, T. A psychometric approach to intuitive physics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 740–745 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196766
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196766