Abstract
Analogical inferences can modify people’s understanding, but can this occur even when the inferences are unpalatable? We report two experiments suggesting that this is the case. Participants read a source passage on the role and status of gay people in society. Half then read an analogy describing the historical persecution of left-handers. On a subsequent recognition test, the participants who read the analogy were more likely than the control participants to misrecognize analogical inferences as statements explicitly presented, but the two groups did not differ in recognition rates for other kinds of statements. A priori explicit attitudes toward gays did not moderate these findings, although the participants with more positive attitudes toward gays saw the analogy to left-handers as more sound. Our findings demonstrate that analogical inferences can be seamlessly integrated into mental representations of the target domain even when those inferences are unpalatable; in short, resistance to analogy is futile.
Article PDF
References
Blanchette, I., &Dunbar, K. (1999). Memory for analogies and analogical inferences. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 73–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blanchette, I., &Dunbar, K. (2002). Representational change and analogy: How analogical inferences alter representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 672–685.
Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clement, C., &Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping.Cognitive Science,15, 89–132.
Day, S. B., & Gentner, D. (in press). Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension.Memory & Cognition.
Ditto, P., &Lopez, D. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,63, 568–584.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dunning, D. (2001). On the motives underlying social cognition. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.),Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 348–374). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7, 155–170.
Gentner, D., &Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.American Psychologist,52, 45–56.
Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., &Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness.Cognitive Psychology,25, 524–575.
Herek, G. (Ed.) (1998).Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holyoak, K., &Thagard, P. (1995).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,108, 480–498.
Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., &Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 586–597.
Lord, C., Ross, L., &Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 2098–2109.
Moreno, K., &Bodenhausen, G. (2001). Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,4, 21–29.
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics [Online] (2001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/ t285.pdf.
Spellman, B., &Holyoak, K. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping.Cognitive Psychology,31, 307–346.
Thagard, P., &Shelley, C. (2001). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.),The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 335–362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perrott, D.A., Genter, D. & Bodenhausen, G.V. Resistance is futile: The unwitting insertion of analogical inferences in memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 696–702 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196760
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196760