Abstract
To investigate the contested role of notional number in English subject-verb agreement, we used a sentence completion task to examine agreement with minimally different subject noun-phrases, such as the gang on the motorcycles and the gang near the motorcycles. These contrasting phrases biased different notional construals of collective nouns, such as gang, which are normally ambiguous between plural (distributed) and singular (collected) construals. With subjects biased toward spatial distribution, such as gang on motorcycles, more plural verbs occurred in speakers’ sentence completions than in sentence completions with a bias toward spatial collection such as gang near motorcycles. This offers strong evidence regarding both the existence and the magnitude of notional effects on subject-verb number agreement in English.
Article PDF
References
Bock, K., &Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 57–99.
Bock, K., Eberhard, K., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A. S., &Schriefers, H. (2001). Some attractions of verb agreement.Cognitive Psychology,43, 83–128.
Bock, K., &Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement.Cognitive Psychology,23, 45–93.
Bock, K., Nicol, J., &Cutting, J. C. (1999). The ties that bind: Creating number agreement in speech.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 330–346.
Carreiras, M., & Meseguer, E. (2001, September).Gender and number agreement in sentence comprehension and production in Spanish. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Edinburgh.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 560–578.
Morgan, J. L. (1972). Verb agreement as a rule of English. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, & G. C. Phares (Eds.),Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 278–286). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Solomon, E. S., &Pearlmutter, N. J. (2004). Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production.Cognitive Psychology,49, 1–46.
Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143–186). London: Erlbaum.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., &Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints.Cognition,61, 261–298.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., &Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 186–215.
Vigliocco, G., &Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production.Psychological Bulletin,128, 442–472.
Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R. J., Jarema, G., &Kolk, H. H. J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 407–442.
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II.Psychologische Forschung,4, 301–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humphreys, K.R., Bock, K. Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 689–695 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196759
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196759