Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 771–790 | Cite as

Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall

  • Stephan Lewandowsky
  • Matthew Duncan
  • Gordon D. A. Brown
Theoretical And Review Articles


Time-based theories expect memory performance to decline as the delay between study and recall of an item increases. The assumption of time-based forgetting, central to many models of serial recall, underpins their key behaviors. Here we compare the predictions of time-based and event-based models by simulation and test them in two experiments using a novel manipulation of the delay between study and retrieval. Participants were trained, via corrective feedback, to recall at different speeds, thus varying total recall time from 6 to 10 sec. In the first experiment, participants used the keyboard to enter their responses but had to repeat a word (called thesuppressor) aloud during recall to prevent rehearsal. In the second experiment, articulation was again required, but recall was verbal and was paced by the number of repetitions of the suppressor in between retrieval of items. In both experiments, serial position curves for all retrieval speeds overlapped, and output time had little or no effect. Comparative evaluation of a time-based and an event-based model confirmed that these results present a particular challenge to time-based approaches. We conclude that output interference, rather than output time, is critical in serial recall.


Retention Interval Serial Position List Item Proactive Interference Serial Recall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., Stafford, L., &Turk, D. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 353–369.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1993). The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval?Memory & Cognition,21, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaman, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 371–389.Google Scholar
  7. Beaman, C. P., &Morton, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall.Cognition,77, B59-B65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borowiak, D. S. (1989). Model discrimination for nonlinear regression models. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, G. D. A., &Chater, N. (2001). The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 77–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale-invariant memory and perceptual identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., &Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order.Psychological Review,107, 127–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J. I., McCormack, T., &Hulme, C. (1999). The development of memory for serial order: A temporal-contextual distinctiveness model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.Google Scholar
  17. Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 1055–1062.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Conrad, R., &Hille, B. A. (1958). The decay theory of immediate memory and paced recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,12, 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., &Elliott, E. M. (2000). Memory-search and rehearsal processes and the word length effect in immediate recall: A synthesis in reply to Service.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 666–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., &Brown, G. D. A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 639–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., &Moreno, M. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Nugent, L.D., &Treisman, M. (1997). There are two word-length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity.Psychological Science,8, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Dosher, B. A. (1999). Item interference and time delays in working memory: Immediate serial recall.International Journal of Psychology,34, 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dosher, B. A., &Ma, J. J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 316–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duncan, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003).The time-course of response suppression for within- and between-list repetitions. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  30. Elvevåg, B., Weinberger, D. R., &Goldberg, T. E. (2001). Shortterm memory for serial order in schizophrenia: A detailed examination of error types.Neuropsychology,15, 128–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farrell, S., &Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Friedman, W. J. (2001). Memory processes underlying humans’ chronological sense of the past. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start—end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute?Memory & Cognition,27, 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laming, D. (1992). Analysis of short-term retention: Models for Brown—Peterson experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1342–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewandowsky, S. (1999). Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall: A dynamic network model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewandowsky, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.Memory.Google Scholar
  39. Lewandowsky, S., &Farrell, S. (2000). A redintegration account of the effects of speech rate, lexicality, and word frequency in immediate serial recall.Psychological Research,63, 163–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewandowsky, S., &Li, S.-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited.Psychological Review,101, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1993). Intra-list distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1995). Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 837–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maylor, E. A., Vousden, J., &Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model.Psychology & Aging,14, 572–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCormack, T., Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J., &Henson, R. N. A. (2000). Children’s serial recall errors: Implications for theories of short-term memory development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,76, 222–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse.Psychological Review,39, 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murdock, B. B. (1995). Developing TODAM: Three models for serialorder information.Memory & Cognition,23, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neath, I. (1993). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position functions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 820–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information.International Journal of Psychology,34, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1996). Distinctiveness and very shortterm serial position effects.Memory,4, 225–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ng, M. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2002). Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 391–424.Google Scholar
  60. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Page, M. P. A., &Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall.Psychological Review,105, 761–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Service, E. (2000). Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: Different paradigms answer different questions—A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 661–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turvey, M. T., Brick, P., &Osborn, J. (1970). Proactive interference in short-term memory as a function of prior-item retention interval.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waugh, N. C., &Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory.Psychological Review,72, 89–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wingfield, A., &Byrnes, D. L. (1972). Decay of information in shortterm memory.Science,176, 690–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Lewandowsky
    • 1
  • Matthew Duncan
    • 1
  • Gordon D. A. Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.University of WarwickCoventryEngland

Personalised recommendations