Skip to main content

Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces

Abstract

Images of faces manipulated to make their shapes closer to the average are perceived as more attractive. The influences of symmetry and averageness are often confounded in studies based on full-face views of faces. Two experiments are reported that compared the effect of manipulating the averageness of female faces in profile and full-face views. Use of a profile view allows a face to be ”morphed“ toward an average shape without creating an image that becomes more symmetrical. Faces morphed toward the average were perceived as more attractive in both views, but the effect was significantly stronger for full-face views. Both full-face and profile views morphed away from the average shape were perceived as less attractive. It is concluded that the effect of averageness is independent of any effect of symmetry on the perceived attractiveness of female faces.

References

  • Galton, F. (1878). Composite portraits.Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain & Ireland,8, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., &Rhodes, G. (2000). The attractiveness of non-face averages: Implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces.Psychological Science,11, 285–289.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., &Rhodes, G. (2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H., &Johnson, R. M. (1998). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question.Psychological Science,9, 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowner, R. (1996). Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 662–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., &Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A metaanalytic and theoretical review.Psychological Bulletin,126, 390–423.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J., &Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average.Psychological Science,1, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J., Roggman, L. A., &Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?Psychological Science,5, 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. J., &Perrett, D. I. (2000). Manipulation of color and shape information and its consequence upon recognition and best-likeness judgments.Perception,29, 1291–1312.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., &Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness.Evolution & Human Behavior,20, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. [S.], Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., &Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.Nature,394, 884–887.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., &Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.Nature,368, 239–242.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (1996).Superportraits: Caricatures and recognition. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Profitt, F., Grady, J. M., &Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Roberts, J., &Simmons, L. W. (1999). Reflections on symmetry and attractiveness.Psychology, Evolution, & Gender,1, 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., &Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?Psychological Science,10, 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., &Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration and facial attractiveness.Psychological Science,7, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., &Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty.Perception,30, 611–625.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., &McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?Evolution & Human Behavior,22, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, C. A., Butterworth, G., Roberts, T., Graupner, L., &Hole, G. (1994). Facial aesthetics: Babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.Perception,23, 823–831.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., &Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness.Trends in Cognitive Science,3, 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (2001). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Valentine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valentine, T., Darling, S. & Donnelly, M. Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 482–487 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196599

Keywords

  • Average Shape
  • Average Face
  • Facial Attractiveness
  • Profile View
  • Skin Texture