Skip to main content

Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere

Abstract

In one experiment, we tested for an association between semantic activation in the right hemisphere (RH) and left hemisphere (LH) and the Aha! experience when people recognize solutions to insight-like problems. The compound remote associate problems used in this experiment sometimes evoke an Aha! experience and sometimes do not. On each trial, participants (N = 44) attempted to solve these problems and, after 7 sec, named a target word, made a solution decision, and rated their insight experience of recognizing the solution. As in prior studies, the participants demonstrated more solution priming for solutions presented to the left visual field-RH (lvf-RH) than for solutions presented to the right visual field-LH (rvf-LH). As was predicted, following unsolved problems the participants showed greater priming for solutions that they rated as evoking an insight experience on the subsequent solution decision than for solutions that did not evoke an insight experience. This association was stronger for solutions presented to the lvf-RH than for those presented to the rvf-LH. These results tie the subjective experience of insight to an objective measure-semantic priming-and suggest that people have an Aha! experience in part because they already had semantic activation that could lead them to recognize the solution quickly. We believe semantic activation in both hemispheres cooperatively contributes to problem solving, but weak solution activation that contributes to the Aha! experience is more likely to occur in the RH than in the LH.

References

  • Beeman, M. (1993). Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse.Brain & Language,44, 80–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.),Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M. J., &Bowden, E. M. (2000). The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved insight problems.Memory & Cognition,28, 1231–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E.M., &Gernsbacher, M. A. (2000). Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension.Brain & Language,71, 310–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M., &Chiarello, C. (1998).Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., &Lindsay, M. B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,6, 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bihrle, A. M., Brownell, H. H., Powelson, J. A., &Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and non-humorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients.Brain & Cognition,5, 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulescu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., &Frith, C. D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study.Brain,117, 1241–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the Aha! experience.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 545–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E.M., &Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems.Psychological Science,9, 435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (in press). Compound remote associate problems.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.

  • Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., &Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery.Cognitive Psychology,22, 72–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, H.H., Michel, D., Powelson, J.A., &Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right hemisphere patients.Brain & Language,18, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., &Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients.Brain & Language,29, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Michelow, D., &Gardner, H. (1984). Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation?Brain & Language,22, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C., &Simpson, G. (1988). Hemispheric processing of ambiguous words.Brain & Language,33, 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C. (1998). On codes of meaning and the meaning of codes: Semantic access and retrieval within and between hemispheres. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.),Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., &Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don’t, … sometimes, some places.Brain & Language,38, 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, L. T., Balota, D. A., &Neely, J. H. (1992). On the relation between feeling of knowing and lexical decision: Persistent subthreshold activation or topic familiarity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 125–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominowski, R. L., &Dallob, P. I. (1995). Insight and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 33–62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., &Kilhstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 257–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M., &Chiarello, C. (1998). Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.Neuropsychologia,36, 827–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M., Kravetz, S., &Babkoff, H. (1993a). Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language.Brain & Language,44, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M., Kravetz, S., &Babkoff, H. (1993b). Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences.Brain & Language,44, 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., &Gernsbacher, M.A. (1996). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension.Brain & Language,53, 234–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, S. M., &Schooler, J. W. (1998). Right hemisphere contributions to creative problem solving: Converging evidence for divergent thinking. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.),Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 349–371). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., &Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 197–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto, M. (1997). Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres.Neuropsychologia,35, 497–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N.R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans II: The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness.Journal of Comparative Psychology,12, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,69, 220–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. &Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving.Memory & Cognition,15, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, A. (1991). Role of anterior and posterior attention networks in hemispheric asymmetries during lexical decisions.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & J. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. Keane & K. Gilhooley (Eds.),Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D.A., Gernsbacher, M.A., Guidotti, S. J., Robertson, R.R.W., Irwin, W., Mock, B. J., &Campana, M.E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension.Psychological Science,11, 255–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Fallshore, M., &Fiore, S. M. (1995). Epilogue: Putting insight into perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight(pp.559–587). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J.W., &Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith & T. B. Ward (Eds.),The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J.W., Ohlsson, S., &Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., &Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 229–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. George, M. Kutas, M., Martinez, A., &Sereno, M. I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing.Brain,122, 1317–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titone, D. (1998). Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution.Brain & Language,65, 361–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E., &Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients.Brain,100, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, I., &Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward M. Bowden.

Additional information

Research and writing were supported by NIDCD/NIH Grants R29 DC 02160 and R01 DC 04052 to M.J.B. Data were collected while both authors were at Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowden, E.M., Jung-Beeman, M. Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 730–737 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196539

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196539

Keywords

  • Target Word
  • Left Hemisphere
  • Right Hemisphere
  • Solution Priming
  • Semantic Activation