Abstract
A rhesus monkey’s memory was tested for single items and four-item lists of natural and environmental sounds. Memory items were presented from a center speaker, followed by a retention delay and then a choice response to a test sound presented simultaneously from two side speakers. Recognition of the last item of four-item lists was much poorer than that of single items at 0-, 1-, and 2-sec delays, despite there being the same temporal relations between study and test. This result showed that the first three items proactively interfered with memory of the last list item. Proactive interference dissipated after 2 sec, revealing a recency effect that eventually equaled single-item performance. Recognition of the first item of four-item lists was much poorer than single items at 20- and 30-sec delays, showing that the last three items retroactively interfered with memory of the first list item. The results point to the critical nature of interference processes in the understanding of serial position functions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (2002). Methodology and statistics in single-subject experiments. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.),Stevens’ Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 301–337). New York: Wiley.
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–105). New York: Academic Press.
Barnes, J. M., &Underwood, B. J. (1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 97–105.
Bjork, R. A. (2001). Recency and recovery in human memory. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 211–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Campbell, R., &Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 85–99.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G., &Neath, I. (1991). The microscope metaphor in human memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock, Jr. (pp. 111–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Foucault, M. (1928). Les inhibitions internes de fixation.Anneé Psychologique,29, 92–112.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Greene, R. L. (1992).Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Haarmann, H., &Usher, M. (2001). Maintenance of semantic information in capacity-limited item short-term memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 568–578.
Harrison, J. M., Iversen, S. D., &Pratt, S. R. (1977). Control of responding by location of auditory stimuli: Adjacency of sound and response.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,28, 243–251.
Hull, C. L. (1935). The conflicting psychologies of learning—a way out.Psychological Review,42, 491–516.
Knoedler, A. J., Hellwig, K. A., &Neath, I. (1999). The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 474–487.
Koppenaal, R. J. (1963). Time changes in the strengths of A-B, A-C lists: Spontaneous recovery?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 310–319.
Melton, A. W., &von Lackum, W. J. (1941). Retroactive and proactive inhibition in retention: Evidence for a two-factor theory of retroactive inhibition.American Journal of Psychology,54, 157–173.
Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 689–698.
Neath, I., &Knoedler, A. J. (1994). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition and sentence processing.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 776–795.
Nipher, F. E. (1876). On the distribution of numbers written from memory.Transactions of the Academy of St. Louis,3, 79–80.
Postman, L., Stark, K., &Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 672–694.
Shapiro, K. L., Jacobs, W. J., &LoLordo, V. M. (1980). Stimulus-reinforcer interactions in Pavlovian conditioning of pigeons: Implications for selective associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 586–594.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 174–215
Surprenant, A. M. (2001). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in tonal sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 737–745.
Underwood, B. J. (1948a). Retroactive and proactive inhibition after five and forty-eight hours.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 29–38.
Underwood, B. J. (1948b). “Spontaneous recovery” of verbal associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 429–439.
Ward, L. B. (1937). Reminiscence and rote learning.Psychological Monographs,49 (4).
Wheeler, M. A. (1995). Improvement in recall over time without repeated testing: Spontaneous recovery revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 173–184.
Wright, A. A. (1998a). Auditory and visual serial position functions obey different laws.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 564–584.
Wright, A. A. (1998b). Auditory list memory in rhesus monkeys.Psychological Science,9, 91–98.
Wright, A. A. (1999a). Auditory list memory and interference in monkeys.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,25, 284–296.
Wright, A. A. (1999b). Visual list memory in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology,113, 74–80.
Wright, A. A. (2002). Monkey auditory list memory: Tests with mixed and blocked retention delays.Animal Learning & Behavior,30, 158–164.
Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., Sands, S. F., Kendrick, D. F. &Cook, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.Science,229, 287–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, A.A., Roediger, H.L. Interference processes in monkey auditory list memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 696–702 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196534
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196534