Abstract
Semantic priming in the lexical decision task has been shown to increase when the proportion of related-prime trials is increased. This finding typically is taken as evidence for a conscious, strategic use of primes. Three experiments are reported in which masked semantic primes displayed for only 45 msec were tested in high- versus low-relatedness proportion conditions. Relatedness proportion was increased either by using a high proportion of semantically related primes or a large set of repetitionprimed filler trials. Semantic priming was consistently enhanced relative to a low-relatedness proportion condition. These relatedness proportion effects were not due to conscious, strategic use of primes: Exclusion of prime-aware subjects did not attenuate the effects, and better performance in a prime classification task was not associated with larger semantic priming effects. These results are interpreted within a retrospective account of semantic priming in which recruitment of a prime event is modulated by prime validity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, S. W., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Reinstating study context produces unconscious influences of memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 270–278.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 468–482.
Bodner, G. E., &Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 268–293.
Bodner, G. E., &Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 616–647.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., van de Moortele, P., &Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature,395, 597–600.
den Heyer, K., Briand, K., &Dannenbring, G. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical decision task: Evidence for automatic and attentiondriven processes.Memory & Cognition,11, 374–381.
Durante, R., &Hirshman, E. (1994). Retrospective priming and masked semantic priming: The interfering effects of prime activation.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 112–127.
Fischler, I., &Goodman, G. (1978). Latency of associative activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 455–470.
Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., Tzelgov, J., &Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming.Memory & Cognition,22, 157–168.
Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., &Johnson, J. D. (2001). With great expectations, can two “wrongs” prime a “right”?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1451–1463.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Kahan, T. A. (2000). Negative priming from masked primes: Retrospective prime clarification or center-surround inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1392–1410.
Kouider, S., &Dupoux, E. (2001). A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from unconscious priming.Cognition,82, 35–49.
Kučera, J., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
Masson, M. E. J., &Isaak, M. I. (1999). Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming.Memory & Cognition,27, 399–412.
McNamara, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval.Psychological Review,99, 650–662.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word-recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 98–118). New York: Academic Press.
Naccache, L., &Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.Cognition,80, 215–229.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word Recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., &Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., &Ross, K. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1003–1019.
Perea, M., &Gotor, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming.Cognition,62, 223–240.
Perea, M., &Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulusonset asynchronies?Acta Psychologica,110, 103–124.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 459–477.
Stolz, J. A., &Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 596–611.
Ulrich, R., &Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 34–80.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?Journal of Memory & Language,29, 546–565.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through a postgraduate scholarship and a research grant to G.E.B. and research and equipment grants to M.E.J.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bodner, G.E., Masson, M.E.J. Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 645–652 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196527
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196527