Abstract
How is conceptual knowledge transmitted during conversation? When a speaker refers to an object, the name that the speaker chooses conveys information about categoryidentity. In addition, I propose that a speaker’s confidence in a classification can convey information about categorystructure. Because atypical instances of a category are more difficult to classify than typical instances, when speakers refer to these instances their lack of confidence will manifest itself “paralinguistically”—that is, in the form of hesitations, filled pauses, or rising prosody. These features can help listeners learn by enabling them to differentiate good from bad examples of a category. So that this hypothesis could be evaluated, in a category learning experiment participants learned a set of novel colors from a speaker. When the speaker’s paralinguistically expressed confidence was consistent with the underlying category structure, learners acquired the categories more rapidly and showed better category differentiation from the earliest moments of learning. These findings have important implications for theories of conversational coordination and language learning.
Article PDF
References
Barr, D. J. (2001). Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In C. Cavé, I. Guaïtella, & S. Santi (Eds.),Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp. 597–600). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Barr, D. J. (2003).Paralinguistic correlates of discourse structure.
Bolinger, D. L. (1964). Intonation: Around the edge of language.Harvard Educational Review,34, 282–296.
Brennan, S. E., &Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1482–1493.
Brennan, S. E., &Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech.Journal of Memory & Language,44, 274–296.
Brennan, S. E., &Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 383–398.
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review,65, 14–21.
Butterworth, B. (1980). Evidence from pauses in speech. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 155–176). London: Academic Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996).Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., &Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Clark, H. H., &Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Usinguh andum in spontaneous speaking.Cognition,84, 73–111.
Clark, H. H., &Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process.Cognition,22, 1–39.
Dell, G. S., &Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 611–629.
Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners’ uses ofum anduh in speech comprehension.Memory & Cognition,29, 320–326.
Fox Tree, J. E., &Clark, H. H. (1997). Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking.Cognition,62, 151–167.
Freud, S. (1966).The psychopathology of everyday life (A.Tyson, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1914)
Garrod, S., &Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination.Cognition,27, 181–218.
Garrod, S., &Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions.Cognition,53, 181–215.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968).Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech.Cognition,14, 41–104.
Maclay, H., &Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous speech.Word,15, 19–44.
Markman, A. B., &Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 331–354.
Mervis, C. B., &Pani, J. R. (1980). Acquisition of basic object categories.Cognitive Psychology,12, 496–522.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Sabbagh, M. A., &Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between theory of mind and semantic development.Child Development,72, 1054–1070.
Sacks, H., &Schelgloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.),Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington.
Smith, V. L., &Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 25–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted while the author was a research fellow at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology in Urbana, IL.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barr, D.J. Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 462–467 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196507
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196507