Abstract
The word length effect is the finding that short items are remembered better than long items on immediate serial recall tests. The time-based word length effect refers to this finding when the lists comprise items that vary only in pronunciation time. Three experiments compared recall of three different sets of disyllabic words that differed systematically only in spoken duration. One set showed a word length effect, one set showed no effect of word length, and the third showed a reverse word length effect, with long words recalled better than short. A new fourth set of words was created, and it also failed to yield a time-based word length effect. Because all four experiments used the same methodology and varied only the stimulus sets, it is argued that the time-based word length effect is not robust and as such poses problems for models based on the phonological loop.
Article PDF
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal ofMemory& Language,34, 594–621.
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.
Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 1055–1062.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, A. (1971).Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Miflin.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Kellar, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of wordlength on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.
Dosher, B. A., &Ma, J.-J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Outputtime versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgettingmatched materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 316–335.
Longoni, A. M., Richardson, J. T. E., &Aiello, A. (1993). Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory.Memory & Cognition,21, 11–22.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.
Mackworth, J. F. (1963). The duration of the visual image.Canadian Journal of Psychology,17, 62–81.
Miyake, A., &Shah, P. (EDS.) (1999).Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.
Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., &Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 702–709.
Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.PsychonomicBulletin & Review,2, 429–441.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76 (1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.
Service, E. (2000). Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: Different paradigms answer different questions—A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 661–665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neath, I., Bireta, T.J. & Surprenant, A.M. The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 430–434 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196502
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196502