Abstract
What constitutes a word’s associative past? Words differ in how many associates they activate in memory and, following a brief encounter, those with fewer associates are more likely to be recalled in the presence of related cues. The issue addressed in the present article is whether associative set size effects are produced through the selective activation of strong associates or through the activation of both strong and weak associates. The set size of the strongest associates was varied factorially with the set size of the associates of these associates. We assume that associate set size indexes a word’s weaker associates. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that recall varied inversely with both target and associate set sizes. Such results held over variations in study time and participant age. Experiment 3 showed that weak associates of the target had a greater effect on recall when there were more connections among the strongest associates in the set. The findings suggest that activation is not strength selective but includes both weak and strong associates.
Article PDF
References
Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104.
Gee, N. R. (1997). Implicit memory and word ambiguity.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 253–275.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
McEvoy, C. L. (2001, March).Aging and remembering: How does what you know influence memory for what is new? Paper presented at Southeastern Workers in Memory, Atlanta.
McEvoy, C. L., Holley, P. E., &Nelson, D. L. (1995). Age effects in cued recall: Forces from implicit and explicit memory.Psychology & Aging,10, 314–324.
McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., &Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of inter-item associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1177–1194.
Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., &Leibert, T. W. (1997). One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.Memory & Cognition,25, 785–796.
Nelson, D. L., &Goodmon, L. B. (2002). Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words.Memory & Cognition,30, 380–398.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (2002). How can the same type of prior knowledge both help and hinder recall?Journal of Memory & Language,46, 652–663.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Dennis, S. (2000). What is free association and what does it measure?Memory & Cognition,28, 887–899.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1999).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and fragment norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., &Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.Psychological Review,3, 299–324.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.
Nelson, D. L., &Zhang, N. (2000). The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 604–617.
Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., &McKinney, V. M. (2001). The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1147–1150.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. (2002).Small worlds in semantic networks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Twilley, L. C., &Dixon, P. (2000). Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 49–82.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.
Watts, D. J., &Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small World” networks.Nature,393, 440–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants MH16360 from the National Institute of Mental Health to D.L.N. and AG13973 from the National Institute on Aging to C.L.M.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, D.L., McKinney, V.M. & McEvoy, C.L. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 118–124 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196475
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196475