False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing

Abstract

The effects of retention interval and level of processing on false recall and false recognition of associates were examined. False recall and false recognition were induced by presenting subjects with words closely associated with a nonstudied word. Both level of processing and retention interval affected false recall (Experiment 1) and false recognition (Experiment 2) in the same direction with which they affected accurate recall and accurate recognition. That is, semantically processed lists exhibited higher levels of later false recall and false recognition than did superficially processed lists. Furthermore, a decline in false recall and false recognition occurred across retention intervals of 0, 2, and 7 days. However, the decline in false recall and false recognition was less pronounced than the decline in accurate recall and accurate recognition. Results are consistent with source monitoring and fuzzy trace explanations of false recall and false recognition.

References

  1. Barclay, C. R., &Wellman, H. M. (1986). Accuracies and inaccuracies in autobiographical memories.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Galluccio, L., &Stofer, K. A. (1999). Reducing gist-based false recognition in older adults: Encoding and retrieval manipulations.Psychology & Aging,14, 220–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leicht, K. L. (1968). Recall and judged frequency of implicitly occurring words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 918–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loftus, G. R. (1985). Evaluating forgetting curves.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (in press). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration.Journal of Memory & Language.

  14. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processing in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reyna, V. F., &Kiernan, B. (1994). Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval.Developmental Psychology,30, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rhodes, M. G., &Anastasi, J. S. (2000). The effects of a levels-ofprocessing manipulation on false recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roediger, H. L., III,Balota, D. A., &Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9, 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.),Theories of memory II (pp. 187–245). Hove, U.K.: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Slamecka, N. J. (1985). On comparing rates of forgetting: Comment on Loftus (1985).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 812–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spiro, R. J. (1980). Accomodative reconstruction in prose recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories.Memory & Cognition,27, 494–500.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sulin, R. A., &Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tussing, A. A., &Greene, R. L. (1997). False recognition of associates: How robust is the effect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anjali Thapar or Kathleen B. McDermott.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a Williams College Faculty Research grant awarded to A.T. and by NIMH Grant 1RO3 MH59034-01 to K.B.M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thapar, A., McDermott, K.B. False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition 29, 424–432 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196393

Download citation

Keywords

  • Retention Interval
  • False Memory
  • Study List
  • Item Type
  • False Recognition